Aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: determinants of cardiac mortality and ventricular function recovery.

OBJECTIVE The influence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction on survival of patients with severe aortic stenosis is poorly characterized. Few data are available about preoperative predictors of cardiac mortality and LV function recovery after aortic valve replacement of such patients. The aim of our study was to examine the outcome and the preoperative predictors of postoperative cardiac death and of LV function recovery in these patients. METHODS We evaluated 85 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm(2)) and severe depression of LV ejection fraction (EF) <35% at cardiac catheterization. Among them, 52 underwent aortic valve replacement and they were compared to patients who were not operated on. All patients had a mean clinical follow-up of 53 months and 94% of them had a mean echocardiographic follow-up of 14 months after aortic valve replacement. RESULTS The mean baseline characteristics included: LVEF 28+/-6%, peak-to-peak transvalvular gradient 51+/-29 mmHg, aortic valve area 0.63+/-0.25 cm(2). Thirty-three patients did not undergo aortic valve replacement: 32 of them died within 3 years. Fifty-two patients underwent aortic valve replacement and 16 had a concomitant coronary bypass surgery. In-hospital mortality was 8%. Postoperative NYHA functional class changed from 2.84+/-0.67 to 1.43+/-0.44 (P<0.001) and LVEF from 29+/-6% to 43+/-10% (P<0.001). At follow-up 10 patients died of heart disease. By multivariate analysis, preoperative LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) was the only covariate of cardiac death (LVESVI/10 ml/m(2), OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.8, P<0.028). By using a receiver operating characteristic curve, LVESVI< or =90 ml/m(2) was the best cut-off value (sensitivity and specificity 78%) to fit with a better survival (93% vs. 63%, P<0.01) and with LVEF recovery after aortic valve replacement (EF improved by 15+/-10% vs. 8+/-5%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite LV dysfunction, aortic valve replacement appears to change drastically the natural history of severe aortic stenosis. Preoperative LV levels predict different postoperative survival rate and LVEF recovery.

[1]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  N. Nanda,et al.  Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. , 1987, Circulation.

[3]  C. Lillehei,et al.  LEFT RETROGRADE CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY IN ACQUIRED CARDIAC DISEASE: TECHNIC, INDICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS IN 700 CASES. , 1964, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  B Maisch,et al.  Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies. , 1996, Circulation.

[5]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Severe Aortic Stenosis with Impaired Left Ventricular Function and Clinical Heart Failure: Results of Valve Replacement , 1978, Circulation.

[6]  N C Nanda,et al.  Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  W. Edwards,et al.  Coronary artery disease and its management: influence on survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Ross,et al.  Aortic Stenosis , 1968, Circulation.

[9]  Franz Schwarz,et al.  The Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement on Survival , 1982, Circulation.

[10]  Daniel Levy,et al.  Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Seward,et al.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. , 1997, Circulation.

[12]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Echocardiographic Prediction of Survival After Surgical Correction of Organic Mitral Regurgitation , 1994, Circulation.

[13]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.

[14]  L. Cohn,et al.  Hemodynamic Determinants of Prognosis of Aortic Valve Replacement in Critical Aortic Stenosis and Advanced Congestive Heart Failure , 1980, Circulation.

[15]  A J Tajik,et al.  Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Lauer,et al.  Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Magovern,et al.  Aortic valve replacement and combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting: predicting high risk groups. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[19]  H. Scheld,et al.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation and stenosis, in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. , 2003, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  J. Fast,et al.  Limits of reproducibility of cross-sectional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction. , 1990, International journal of cardiology.