Resistance to the impact of interruptions during multitasking by healthy adults and dysexecutive patients.

Two experiments (one with healthy adult volunteers and the other with controls and dysexecutive patients) assessed the impact of interruptions on a novel test of multitasking. The test involved switching repeatedly between four tasks (block construction, bead threading, paper folding, alphabetical searching) over a 10 min period. In Experiment 1, there were four groups of 20 healthy participants. One group attempted multitasking with no interruption, a second group was interrupted early in the test, a third group late in the test and a fourth group was interrupted both early and late. Interruption involved carrying out a fifth, unexpected task for a period of 1 min before returning to the four main tasks. There was no difference in multitasking performance between the groups. In Experiment 2 the participants were seven dysexecutive patients and 14 age-matched controls. A repeated measures approach was employed to assess the impact of two interruptions (early and late) for both groups. Contrary to predictions, the patients as well as controls were resistant to the effects of interruptions, despite their clearly impaired multitasking performance. These results suggest that the ability to deal with interruptions may be separable from the ability to organise and execute multiple tasks within a limited time frame.

[1]  D. Stuss,et al.  Assessment of strategic self-regulation in traumatic brain injury: its relationship to injury severity and psychosocial outcome. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[2]  John Long,et al.  A design-oriented framework for modelling the planning and control of multiple task work in secretarial office administration , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  E. Capitani,et al.  Wisconsin card sorting test: a new global score, with Italian norms, and its relationship with the Weigl sorting test , 2000, Neurological Sciences.

[4]  W. Cordell,et al.  Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[7]  I. Robertson,et al.  Rehabilitation of executive function: facilitation of effective goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory alerts , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  P W Burgess,et al.  Unilateral frontal lobectomy can produce strategy application disorder. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[10]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[11]  D. Rapaport.  Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources , 1965 .

[12]  M. B. Edwards,et al.  Task interruption and its effects on memory. , 1998, Memory.

[13]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities , 1999 .

[14]  Anna S. Law.  Human adult multitasking : developing and applying a methodology. , 2004 .

[15]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  J. Cockburn,et al.  Task Interruption in Prospective Memory: A Frontal Lobe Function? , 1995, Cortex.

[17]  A Latorella Kara,et al.  Investigating Interruptions: Implications for Flightdeck Performance , 1999 .

[18]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making: An Information Overload Perspective , 1999 .

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Intention, will and need. , 1951 .

[22]  B. Zeigarnik.  On finished and unfinished tasks. , 1938 .

[23]  H Eyrolle,et al.  The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR , 1986 .

[25]  P. Burgess,et al.  The ecological validity of tests of executive function , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[26]  Maria Ovsiankina,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1928 .

[27]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  A. Worthington.  Dysexecutive paramnesia: Strategic retrieval deficits in retrospective and prospective remembering , 1999 .

[29]  P W Burgess,et al.  Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking , 2000, Psychological research.

[30]  Taketoshi Takuma.  Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Hand-lungen bei schwachsinnigen Kindern , 1957 .

[31]  David Clark-Carter,et al.  Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design To Report , 1997 .

[32]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation , 1985, Neurology.

[33]  M Schwartz,et al.  The effects of focal and diffuse brain damage on strategy application: Evidence from focal lesions, traumatic brain injury and normal aging , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.