Gravity and Spatial Structure: The Case of Interstate Migration in Mexico

The estimation of gravity models of internal (aggregate) place‐to‐place migration is plagued with endogeneity (omitted‐variable) biases if the unobserved effects of spatial structure are not accounted for. To address this econometric problem, this paper presents a more general specification of the gravity model, which allows for (bilateral) parameter heterogeneity across individual migration paths — along with (unilateral) origin‐ and destination‐specific effects. The resultant “three‐way fixed‐effects” (3FE) model is applied for an analysis of interstate migration in Mexico based on cross‐sectional data. To overcome parameter‐dimensionality problems (due to limited or incomplete information), the 3FE model is estimated using the Generalized Maximum Entropy (GME) estimator. The empirical implications of this new modeling strategy are illustrated by contrasting the 3FE‐GME estimates with those for the traditional and two‐way fixed‐effects (2FE) models. The former are far more plausible and intuitively interpretable than their traditional and 2FE counterparts, with parameter estimates changing in expected directions. The (average) effect of the migrant stock is markedly smaller than usually estimated, providing a more realistic measure of network‐induced migration. Migration outflows from centrally located origins have significantly steeper distance decay. Path‐specific distance effects exhibit directional asymmetries and spatial similarities.

[1]  James A. Dunlevy.  Migrant stock vs. lagged migrant flow as a determinant of migrant settlement , 1993, Journal of population economics.

[2]  M. Cadwallader,et al.  Migration and Residential Mobility: Macro and Micro Approaches , 1994 .

[3]  M. Greenwood,et al.  An economic analysis of migration in Mexico , 1978, The annals of regional science.

[4]  Emilio Casetti,et al.  Generating Models by the Expansion Method: Applications to Geographical Research* , 2010 .

[5]  Peder J. Pedersen,et al.  Selection and network effects—Migration flows into OECD countries 1990–2000 , 2008 .

[6]  A Rogers,et al.  The spatial focus of U.S. interstate migration flows. , 1998, International journal of population geography : IJPG.

[7]  Joachim Zietz.  Heteroskedasticity and Neglected Parameter Heterogeneity , 2001 .

[8]  Daniel L. Millimet,et al.  Is gravity linear , 2008 .

[9]  W. Greene,et al.  Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models , 1994 .

[10]  Iain Fraser,et al.  An application of maximum entropy estimation: the demand for meat in the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[11]  J. Wooldridge.  Fixed-Effects and Related Estimators for Correlated Random-Coefficient and Treatment-Effect Panel Data Models , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Semiparametric Filtering of Spatial Autocorrelation: The Eigenvector Approach , 2007 .

[13]  D. McMillen,et al.  Issues in Spatial Data Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Joe Flood,et al.  Interregional Migration Modeling via Entropy and Information Theory , 2010 .

[15]  A. Fotheringham,et al.  Directional Variation in Distance Decay , 1995 .

[16]  C. Zabin,et al.  Economic Integration and Labor Flows: Stage Migration in Farm Labor Markets in Mexico and the United States , 1995, The International migration review.

[17]  D. Istance.  Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1966, Nature.

[18]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  Maximum entropy econometrics: robust estimation with limited data , 1996 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Perloff,et al.  Maximum entropy and Bayesian approaches to the ratio problem , 2001 .

[20]  Alan Wilson,et al.  Entropy in urban and regional modelling , 1972, Handbook on Entropy, Complexity and Spatial Dynamics.

[21]  Michael Tiefelsdorf,et al.  Misspecifications in interaction model distance decay relations: A spatial structure effect , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[22]  Timothy J Hatton,et al.  Explaining U.S. Immigration, 19711998 , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[24]  S. Fotheringham,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression , 1998 .

[25]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[26]  Esfandiar Maasoumi,et al.  Information Theoretic and Entropy Methods: An Overview , 2008 .

[27]  R. Carter Hill,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of the effect of design characteristics on the inequality restricted maximum entropy estimator , 2005 .

[28]  F. Bavaud,et al.  The Quasi-Symmetric Side of Gravity Modelling , 2002 .

[29]  C. Gourieroux,et al.  Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models , 1984 .

[30]  M. Magrini,et al.  Distance–Income Migration Trade-off of Young French Workers: An Analysis per Education Level , 2013 .

[31]  William J. Carrington,et al.  Migration with endogenous moving costs. , 1996 .

[32]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[33]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models , 2003 .

[34]  David A. Plane,et al.  Migration Space: Doubly Constrained Gravity Model Mapping of Relative Interstate Separation , 1984 .

[35]  G. Epstein.  Herd and Network Effects in Migration Decision-Making , 2008 .

[36]  M. Aitkin,et al.  A method of fitting the gravity model based on the Poisson distribution. , 1982, Journal of regional science.

[37]  M. Greenwood.  Internal migration in developed countries , 1993 .

[38]  T. Mayer,et al.  Illusory Border Effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade , 2002 .

[39]  J. Williamson,et al.  Are third world emigration forces abating , 2011 .

[40]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Thirty years of spatial econometrics , 2010 .

[41]  Jim Millington,et al.  Migration and Age: The Effect of Age on Sensitivity to Migration Stimuli , 2000 .

[42]  James A. Pooler,et al.  The development of an intervening opportunities model with spatial dominance effects , 2001, J. Geogr. Syst..

[43]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[44]  Mario R. Cha.  Delimitación de las zonas metropolitanas de México , 2008 .

[45]  Joris Pinkse,et al.  The Future of Spatial Econometrics , 2010 .

[46]  Yixiao Sun,et al.  Spatial Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Estimation of Covariance Matrix , 2010 .

[47]  Vernon Renshaw.  A NOTE ON LAGGED RESPONSE IN THE DECISION TO MIGRATE , 1974 .

[48]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Long-Term Trends In Migratory Behavior In A Developing Country: The Case of Mexico , 1981, Demography.

[49]  P Congdon,et al.  Approaches to Modelling Overdispersion in the Analysis of Migration , 1993, Environment & planning A.

[50]  A. Anjomani,et al.  Migration stock and the issue of competing and complementary flows in United States interstate migration , 1992, Journal of population economics.

[51]  D. Pregibon.  Goodness of Link Tests for Generalized Linear Models , 1980 .

[52]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Modelling Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Interaction Data , 2007 .

[53]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[54]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Quasi‐Likelihood Methods for Count Data , 2008 .

[55]  John Paul Jones,et al.  WARPED SPACE: A GEOGRAPHY OF DISTANCE DECAY* , 1991 .

[56]  Michael R. Pakko,et al.  Reconsidering the Trade-Creating Effects of a Currency Union , 2001 .

[57]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression , 2006, Technometrics.

[58]  Amos Golan.  Information and Entropy Econometrics - A Review and Synthesis , 2008 .

[59]  R. C. Campbell,et al.  Imposing parameter inequality restrictions using the principle of maximum entropy , 2006 .

[60]  Pingzhao Hu,et al.  An empirical test of the competing destinations model , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[61]  P. Eaton,et al.  Migration and intervening opportunities. , 1984, Southern economic journal.

[62]  J. A. Dunlevy,et al.  The Role of Migrant Stock and Lagged Migration in the Settlement Patterns of Nineteenth Century Immigrants , 1977 .

[63]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Chapter 12 Internal migration in developed countries , 1997 .

[64]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  An Analysis of Ill‐Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy , 1998 .

[65]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[66]  Yongwan Chun,et al.  Modeling network autocorrelation within migration flows by eigenvector spatial filtering , 2008, J. Geogr. Syst..

[67]  Wilfried Koch,et al.  'Dual' Gravity: Using Spatial Econometrics to Control for Multilateral Resistance , 2007 .

[68]  Drew A. Linzer,et al.  Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates , 2005, Political Analysis.

[69]  J. Hunt.  STAUNCHING EMIGRATION FROM EAST GERMANY: AGE AND THE DETERMINANTS OF MIGRATION , 2006 .

[70]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[71]  Peter Congdon,et al.  Random‐effects models for migration attractivity and retentivity: a Bayesian methodology , 2010 .

[72]  Barbara Zagaglia,et al.  The Determinants of Internal Mobility in Italy, 1995-2006: A Comparison of Italians and Resident Foreigners , 2013 .

[73]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004 .

[74]  Andrei Rogers,et al.  Using age and spatial flow structures in the indirect estimation of migration streams , 2007, Demography.

[75]  Alicia C. Sasser.  Voting with their feet: Relative economic conditions and state migration patterns , 2010 .

[76]  D A Plane,et al.  An information theoretic approach to the estimation of migration flows. , 1982, Journal of regional science.

[77]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Exponential or Power Distance-Decay for Commuting? An Alternative Specification , 2005 .

[78]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Estimating average partial effects under conditional moment independence assumptions , 2004 .

[79]  S. Fotheringham,et al.  Modelling spatial choice: a review and synthesis in a migration context , 2002 .

[80]  P. A. V. B. Swamy,et al.  Random coefficient models: theory and applications , 1995 .

[81]  P. Mueser.  The spatial structure of migration: an analysis of flows between states in the USA over three decades. , 1989, Regional studies.

[82]  Amos Golan,et al.  Estimating a Demand System with Nonnegativity Constraints: Mexican Meat Demand , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[83]  Ira N. Gang,et al.  The Influence of Stocks and Flows on Migrants’ Location Choices , 2007 .

[84]  N. Duan.  Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation Method , 1983 .

[85]  J. B. Ramsey,et al.  Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least‐Squares Regression Analysis , 1969 .

[86]  R. Berk,et al.  Overdispersion and Poisson Regression , 2008 .

[87]  F. Pukelsheim.  The Three Sigma Rule , 1994 .

[88]  S. Stouffer.  INTERVENING OPPORTUNITIES AND COMPETING MIGRANTS , 2006 .

[89]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Modeling Spatial Autocorrelation in Spatial Interaction Data: An Application to Patent Citation Data in the European Union , 2008 .

[90]  Waldo R. Tobler,et al.  MIGRATION: RAVENSTEIN, THORNTHWAITE, AND BEYOND , 1995 .

[91]  W. Manning,et al.  Estimating Log Models: To Transform or Not to Transform? , 1999, Journal of health economics.