Three-Way Decision Based Overlapping Community Detection

The three-way decision based overlapping community detection algorithm OCDBTWD divides the vesting relationship between communities into three types: completely belong relation, completely not belong relation and incompletely belong relation, and it uses the positive domain, negative domain and boundary domain to describe those vesting relationships respectively. OCDBTWD defines the similarity between communities to quantify the conditional probability when two communities have the vesting relationship, and uses the increment values of extended modularity to reflect the inclusion ratio thresholds. OCDBTWD uses the three-way decision to decide the vesting relationship between communities to guide the merger of them. When the vesting relationship between communities is incompletely belong relation, then the overlapping vertex detection algorithm OVDA is proposed to detect overlapping vertices. OCDBTWD has been tested on both synthetic and real world networks and also compared with other algorithms. The experiments demonstrate its feasibility and efficiency.

[1]  Hong Yu,et al.  Autonomous Knowledge-Oriented Clustering Using Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Theory , 2010, RSKT.

[2]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way Investment Decisions with Decision-theoretic Rough Sets , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[3]  Mao-Bin Hu,et al.  Detect overlapping and hierarchical community structure in networks , 2008, ArXiv.

[4]  Chris Cornelis,et al.  Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems Paradigms , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Huan Liu,et al.  A Social Network Analysis Approach to Detecting Suspicious Online Financial Activities , 2010, SBP.

[6]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Fergal Reid,et al.  Detecting highly overlapping community structure by greedy clique expansion , 2010, KDD 2010.

[8]  Guoyin Wang,et al.  Automatically Determining the Number of Clusters Using Decision-Theoretic Rough Set , 2011, RSKT.

[9]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[11]  F. Radicchi,et al.  Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  On community outliers and their efficient detection in information networks , 2010, KDD.

[14]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society , 2005, Nature.

[15]  M Cieplak.  蛋白質の折りたたみにおける協調性と接触秩序 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2004 .

[16]  Nan Zhang,et al.  Hierarchical rough decision theoretic framework for text classification , 2010, 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10).

[17]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Huaxiong Li,et al.  A Multi-View Decision Model Based on Decision-Theoretic Rough Set , 2009, RSKT.

[19]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[21]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  W. Zachary,et al.  An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups , 1977, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[23]  Patricia L. Mabry,et al.  Advances in Social Computing, Third International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction, SBP 2010, Bethesda, MD, USA, March 30-31, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, SBP.

[24]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Models , 2007, RSKT.

[25]  Andrea Lancichinetti,et al.  Detecting the overlapping and hierarchical community structure in complex networks , 2008, 0802.1218.

[26]  Alexander Rives,et al.  Modular organization of cellular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Huaxiong Li,et al.  Risk Decision Making Based on Decision-theoretic Rough Set: A Three-way View Decision Model , 2011 .

[28]  Jingchun Chen,et al.  Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network , 2006, Bioinform..

[29]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergent properties of a dolphin social network , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Jingtao Yao,et al.  Web-Based Support Systems with Rough Set Analysis , 2007, RSEISP.

[32]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Bor-Sen Chen,et al.  Identification of transcription factor cooperativity via stochastic system model , 2006, Bioinform..

[34]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-Way Decision: An Interpretation of Rules in Rough Set Theory , 2009, RSKT.