Implicative and conjunctive fuzzy rules - A tool for reasoning from knowledge and examples

Fuzzy rule-based systems have been mainly used as a convenient tool for synthesizing control laws from data. Recently, in a knowledge representation-oriented perspective, a typology of fuzzy rules has been laid bare, by emphasizing the distinction between implicative and conjunctive fuzzy rules. The former describe pieces of generic knowledge either tainted with uncertainty or tolerant to similarity, while the latter encode examples-originated information expressing either mere possibilities or how typical situations can be extrapolated.The different types of fuzzy rules are first contrasted, and their representation discussed in the framework of possibility theory. Then, the paper studies the conjoint use of fuzzy rules expressing knowledge (as fuzzy constraints which restrict the possible states of the world), or gathering examples (which testify the possibility of appearance of some states). Coherence and inference issues are briefly addressed.

[1]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Tracks real‐time classification based on fuzzy rules , 1997 .

[2]  Henri Prade,et al.  What are fuzzy rules and how to use them , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Knowledge-Driven versus Data-Driven Logics , 2000, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Calculus of Fuzzy If/Then Rules , 1992, Fuzzy Days.

[5]  Piero P. Bonissone,et al.  Financial applications of fuzzy case-based reasoning to residential property valuation , 1997, Proceedings of 6th International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A Theory of Approximate Reasoning , 1979 .

[7]  D. Dubois,et al.  Efficient inference procedures with fuzzy inputs , 1997, Proceedings of 6th International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[8]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Checking the coherence and redundancy of fuzzy knowledge bases , 1997, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..