A 3D parametric inversion algorithm for triaxial induction data

We develop a parametric inversion algorithm to determine simultaneously the horizontal and vertical resistivities of both the formation and invasion zones, invasion radius, bed boundary upper location and thickness, and relative dip angle from electromagnetic triaxial induction logging data. This is a full 3D inverse scattering problem in transversally isotropic media. To acquire sufficient sensitivity to invert for all of these parameters, we collect the data using a multicomponent, multispacing induction array. For each transmitter-receiver spacing this multicomponent tool has sets of three orthogonal transmitter and receiver coils. At each logging point single-frequency data are collected at multiple spacings to obtain information at different depths of investigation. This inversion problem is solved iteratively with a constrained regularized Gauss-Newton minimization scheme. As documented in the literature, the main computational bottleneck when solving this full 3D inverse problem is the CPU time associated with constructing the Jacobian matrix. In this study, to achieve the inversion results within a reasonable computational time, we implement a dual grid approach wherein the Jacobian matrix is computed using a very coarse optimal grid. Furthermore, to regularize the inversion process we use the so-called multiplicative regularization technique. This technique automatically determines the regularization parameter. Synthetic data tests indicate the developed inversion algorithm is robust in extracting formation and invasion anisotropic resistivities, invasion radii, bed boundary locations, relative dip, and azimuth angle from multispacing, multicomponent induction logging data.

[1]  Juun van der Horst,et al.  A New Multicomponent Induction Logging Tool To Resolve Anisotropic Formations , 2000 .

[2]  Aria Abubakar,et al.  Determining Formation Resistivity Anisotropy in the Presence of Invasion , 2004 .

[3]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  TWO- AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL ALGORITHMS FOR MICROWAVE IMAGING AND INVERSE SCATTERING , 2003 .

[4]  Vladimir Druskin,et al.  Gaussian Spectral Rules for the Three-Point Second Differences: I. A Two-Point Positive Definite Problem in a Semi-Infinite Domain , 1999, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[5]  Baker Atlas,et al.  A fast inversion method for multicomponent induction log data , 2001 .

[6]  David L. Alumbaugh,et al.  One-Dimensional Inversion of Three-Component Induction Logging In Anisotropic Media , 2001 .

[7]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[8]  A. Abubakar,et al.  Multiplicative regularization for contrast profile inversion , 2003 .

[9]  Sofia Davydycheva,et al.  An efficient finite‐difference scheme for electromagnetic logging in 3D anisotropic inhomogeneous media , 2003 .

[10]  Jacques R. Tabanou,et al.  Fast And Rigorous Inversion of Triaxial Induction Logging Data to Determine Formation Resistivity Anisotropy, Bed Boundary Position, Relative Dip And Azimuth Angles , 2003 .

[11]  A. Abubakar,et al.  A General Framework for Constraint Minimization for the Inversion of Electromagnetic Measurements , 2004 .

[12]  Alberto G. Mezzatesta,et al.  2D anisotropic inversion of multicomponent induction logging data , 2001 .

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[14]  Lev Tabarovsky,et al.  Determination of relative angles and anisotropic resistivity using multicomponent induction logging data , 2004 .