A frame of reference for understanding behaviors related to the academic misconduct of undergraduate teacher education students

The purposes of the present study were to develop a valid self-report survey instrument that would measure the academic misconduct construct and to determine if the instrument could be used effectively to identify different orientations of teacher education students relative to academic misconduct. In an effort to achieve these purposes, an instrument called the Academic Misconduct Survey (AMS) was developed to measure the self-reported academic misconduct behaviors of the respondents. This study was conducted usingR-technique factor analyses and alpha-reliability analyses during Phase I (n=330) to investigate the clustering of variables within the AMS, and Q-technique factor analyses during Phase II (n=90) to investigate the clustering of persons into recognizable prototypes using data obtained from the AMS. Respondents in both phases were undergraduate teacher education students at several selected institutions of higher learning. Phase I results indicated that the instrument measured academic misconduct across five constructs: cheating on tests and assignments, inappropriate use of resources, quasi-misconduct, subtle manipulation, and bold manipulation. The second phase resulted in the identification of several interpretable clusters of persons, ranging from self-proclaimed noncheaters to those who indicated clear propensity toward various types of misconduct.

[1]  J. Rich.  The Role of Professional Ethics in Teacher Education , 1985 .

[2]  G A Hilbert,et al.  Involvement of nursing students in unethical classroom and clinical behaviors. , 1985, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[3]  Christopher S. Hawley.  The Thieves of Academe: Plagiarism in the University System , 1984 .

[4]  G. Diekhoff,et al.  College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude , 1986 .

[5]  L. P. Stavisky.  Term Paper "Mills," Academic Plagiarism, and State Regulation , 1973 .

[6]  Marvin Karlins,et al.  An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates , 1988 .

[7]  A. C. Singhal,et al.  Factors in Students' Dishonesty , 1982 .

[8]  D. C. Barnett,et al.  Why College Students Cheat. , 1981 .

[9]  R. Fass.  By Honor Bound: Encouraging Academic Honesty. , 1986 .

[10]  A. Ornstein.  An introduction to the foundations of education , 1977 .

[11]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique , 1987 .

[12]  F Sierles,et al.  Cheating in medical school. , 1980, Journal of medical education.

[13]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .

[14]  Charles A. Drake.  Why Students Cheat , 1941 .

[15]  C P Smith,et al.  Moral decision making: cheating on examinations. , 1972, Journal of personality.

[16]  J. F. Soltis.  Teaching Professional Ethics , 1986 .

[17]  D. Chisholm.  An Epidemic of Cheating? , 1992, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[18]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  Philip Garcia,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists: Techniques for Analyzing and Simplifying Complex Blocks of Data. , 1984 .

[20]  L. Havlicek,et al.  Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. , 1986, Journal of allied health.

[21]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A first course in factor analysis , 1973 .

[22]  J. Harp,et al.  Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating Among College Students , 1966 .

[23]  L. Daniel,et al.  Academic misconduct among teacher education students: A descriptive-correlational study , 1991 .

[24]  C. Pratt,et al.  An analysis of predictors of college students' ethical inclinations , 1989 .

[25]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis with readings (2nd ed.) , 1986 .

[26]  A. Tom.  Teaching as a moral craft , 1984 .

[27]  B. Thompson.  Comparison of Two Strategies for Collecting Q-Sort Data , 1980 .

[28]  G. Tom,et al.  Cheating in Academe , 1988 .

[29]  Geoffrey Keppel,et al.  Science and Behavior: An Introduction to Methods of Research. 2nd ed. , 1981 .

[30]  K. Howe.  A Conceptual Basis for Ethics in Teacher Education , 1986 .

[31]  K. Strike,et al.  The Ethics of Teaching , 1985 .

[32]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[33]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[34]  Bruce Thompson.  Factor Stability as a Function of Item Variance. , 1981 .

[35]  W. Stephenson.  The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[36]  Solomon E. Feldman,et al.  College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. , 1964 .

[37]  John M. Neale,et al.  Science and behavior : an introduction to methods of research / John M. Neale , 1973 .

[38]  J. S. Baird,et al.  Current trends in college cheating , 1980 .

[39]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[40]  F. Kerlinger.  Behavioral Research: A Conceptual Approach , 1978 .

[41]  Sara Hart,et al.  Computer Usage in Accounting Education at AACSB-Accredited Universities , 1988 .

[42]  Geoffrey E. Mills,et al.  Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application , 1995 .

[43]  F. W. Parr.  The Problem of Student Honesty , 1936 .

[44]  John I. Goodlad,et al.  The Moral Dimensions of Teaching , 1991 .

[45]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[46]  Lionel Standing,et al.  An Evaluation of the Cloze Procedure as a Test for Plagiarism , 1986 .

[47]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating. , 1989 .

[48]  A. L. Edwards.  The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .