Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms

Abstract In recent years, there has been a push to introduce coding and computational thinking in early childhood education, and robotics is an excellent tool to achieve this. However, the integration of these fundamental skills into formal and official curriculums is still a challenge and educators needs pedagogical perspectives to properly integrate robotics, coding and computational thinking concepts into their classrooms. Thus, this study evaluates a “coding as a playground” experience in keeping with the Positive Technological Development (PTD) framework with the KIBO robotics kit, specially designed for young children. The research was conducted with preschool children aged 3–5 years old (N = 172) from three Spanish early childhood centers with different socio-economic characteristics and teachers of 16 classes. Results confirm that it is possible to start teaching this new literacy very early (at 3 years old). Furthermore, the results show that the strategies used promoted communication, collaboration and creativity in the classroom settings. The teachers also exhibited autonomy and confidence to integrate coding and computational thinking into their formal curricular activities, connecting concepts with art, music and social studies. Through the evidence found in this study, this research contributes with examples of effective strategies to introduce robotics, coding and computational thinking into early childhood classrooms.

[1]  Jan van den Akker,et al.  Principles and Methods of Development Research , 1999 .

[2]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom , 2017 .

[3]  Peter Twining,et al.  Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Marina Umaschi Bers.  Beyond computer literacy: supporting youth's positive development through technology. , 2010, New directions for youth development.

[5]  Walter Gander,et al.  Informatics Education: Europe cannot afford to miss the boat , 2013 .

[6]  Martin Kandlhofer,et al.  Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils' technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Stefania Bocconi,et al.  Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education - Implications for policy and practice , 2016 .

[8]  H. Öztürk,et al.  Robotics in Early Childhood Education , 2019, Early Childhood Development.

[9]  ChenGuanhua,et al.  Assessing elementary students computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming , 2017 .

[10]  Gregorio Robles,et al.  The Europe Code Week (CodeEU) initiative shaping the skills of future engineers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[11]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  TUI, GUI, HUI: is a bimodal interface truly worth the sum of its parts? , 2013, IDC.

[12]  Susan Staffin Metz,et al.  Attracting the Engineers of 2020 Today , 2007 .

[13]  Albert A. Einsiedel,et al.  Developing Career Commitment in STEM-related Fields: Myths versus Reality , 2007 .

[14]  Marcos Romn-Gonzlez,et al.  Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade , 2015, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

[17]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers , 2017, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

[18]  Sofia Serholt,et al.  Breakdowns in children's interactions with a robotic tutor: A longitudinal study , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Sung Eun Jung,et al.  Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children , 2018 .

[20]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Kindergarten Robotics: Using Robotics to Motivate Math, Science, and Engineering Literacy in Elementary School* , 2006 .

[21]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Collaboration by Design: Using Robotics to Foster Social Interaction in Kindergarten , 2013 .

[22]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Implementing a Robotics Curriculum in an Early Childhood Montessori Classroom , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[23]  Lee Yong Tay,et al.  TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Nancy F Krebs,et al.  Prevention of pediatric overweight and obesity. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[25]  Marcos Román-González,et al.  Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Constructing the ScratchJr programming language in the early childhood classroom , 2016 .

[27]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[28]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Computer as Paintbrush: Technology, Play, and the Creative Society , 2006 .

[29]  Michail Kalogiannakis,et al.  Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education: a case study , 2016, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[30]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Active Learning Environments with Robotic Tangibles: Children's Physical and Virtual Spatial Programming Experiences , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[31]  Kin Wai Michael Siu,et al.  Early Childhood Technology Education: A Sociocultural Perspective , 2005 .

[32]  Guanhua Chen,et al.  Assessing elementary students' computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Prevention of Pediatric Overweight and Obesity , 2016, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[34]  M. Bers,et al.  Ready for Robotics: Bringing Together the T and E of STEM in Early Childhood Teacher Education. , 2013 .

[35]  Yu-Hui Ching,et al.  Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners , 2018 .

[36]  Stefania Bocconi,et al.  Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education , 2016 .

[37]  D. Yanow,et al.  Interpretation and Method : Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn , 2006 .

[38]  Jeannette M. Wing.  An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[39]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing Kindergartner’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphic, and hybrid user interfaces , 2015 .

[40]  Susan Brooks-Young,et al.  National Educational Technology Standards for Students , 2007 .

[41]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Lydia Plowman,et al.  Computing education in children's early years: A call for debate , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  J. Brannen.  Mixing Methods: qualitative and quantitative research , 2017 .

[44]  Lorna McKnight,et al.  Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: from playpen to playground , 2013 .

[45]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Educational Robotics intervention on Executive Functions in preschool children: A pilot study , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  How Young Children Learn to Program With Sensor, Action, and Logic Blocks , 2008 .

[47]  L. Markert,et al.  Gender Related to Success in Science and Technology. , 1996 .