Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory

Remembering to perform deferred actions when an event is encountered in the future is referred to as event-based prospective memory (PM). We examined whether the failure of individuals to allocate sufficient attentional resources to nonfocal PM tasks can be linked to the response demands inherent in PM paradigms that require the PM task to race for response selection with the speeded ongoing task. In three experiments, participants performed a lexical decision task while being required to make a separate PM response to a specific word (focal), an exemplar of a category (nonfocal), or a syllable (nonfocal). We manipulated the earliest time participants could make task responses by presenting a tone at varying onsets (0–1,600 ms) following stimulus presentation. Improvements in focal PM and nonfocal PM were observed at response delays as brief as 200 ms and 400 ms, respectively. Nonfocal PM accuracy was comparable to focal PM accuracy at delays of 600 ms and 1,600 ms for categorical targets and syllable targets, respectively. Delaying task responses freed the resource-demanding processing operations used on the ongoing task for use on the nonfocal PM task, increasing the probability that the nonfocal PM features of ongoing task stimuli were adequately assessed prior to the ongoing task response.

[1]  Rebekah E. Smith The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[3]  R. R. Hunt,et al.  The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Jan Rummel,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Prospective Memory : Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives , 2007 .

[6]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[9]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[11]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Focal and nonfocal prospective memory performance in very mild dementia: a signature decline. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[12]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field , 2007 .

[13]  M. McDaniel,et al.  A characterization of individual differences in prospective memory monitoring using the Complex Ongoing Serial Task. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  R. Marsh,et al.  Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks , 2010, Psychological research.

[16]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  The influence of partial‐match cues on event‐based prospective memory , 2004, Memory.

[17]  Matthias Kliegel,et al.  Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[18]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Normal aging and prospective memory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Jason L. Hicks,et al.  Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  Psychological distance to a prospective memory cue influences the probability of fulfilling a delayed intention , 2010, Memory.

[21]  R. Marsh,et al.  Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions☆ , 2005 .

[22]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms. , 2004 .

[25]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Rebekah E. Smith Connecting the past and the future: Attention, memory, and delayed intentions. , 2008 .

[27]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[28]  U. Bayen,et al.  What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory? , 2011, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  A ballistic model of choice response time. , 2005, Psychological review.

[30]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  R. Key Dismukes,et al.  Remembrance of Things Future: Prospective Memory in Laboratory, Workplace, and Everyday Settings , 2010 .

[32]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[34]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[36]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Melissa J. Guynn,et al.  A two‐process model of strategic monitoring in event‐based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking , 2003 .

[38]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[39]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Prospective memory in an air traffic control simulation: external aids that signal when to act. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[40]  J. Henry,et al.  A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[41]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  Detecting event-based prospective memory cues occurring within and outside the focus of attention. , 2005, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  Mark A McDaniel,et al.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The quarterly journal of experimental psychology , 1985 .

[44]  U. Bayen,et al.  A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  C Dennis Boywitt,et al.  The multinomial model of prospective memory: validity of ongoing-task parameters. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[47]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Effects of practice on task architecture: Combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making , 2011, Cognition.

[48]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  Mike Martin,et al.  Event-based prospective memory in depression: The impact of cue focality , 2009 .