An improved pairwise comparison scaling method for subjective image quality assessment

As human is the final receptor of images, user-perceptive quality of images need to be scaled by subjective quality assessment method, which is also important for learning a high performance of objective image quality assessment model. There are characteristics of randomness and individual difference among subjective testers. Those scores made by unreliable subjects that may affect the scaling of image quality scores, are defined as outliers. Recent studies have shown that pairwise comparison is more reliable and accurate than single stimulus method. However, the traditional outlier detection method for pairwise comparison, i.e, transitivity satisfaction, only compared results for individual participant, ignoring the statistical information among subjects for each pair of images. In this paper, an improved scaling method for pair-wise comparison was proposed, which combines transitivity satisfaction and statistical information among all participants for each pair of images to evaluate the reliability of participant and reject the outlier. Pairwise comparison experimental result on a geometric distorted stereoscopic image database demonstrates the improvement of the proposed method.

[1]  Chin-Laung Lei,et al.  A crowdsourceable QoE evaluation framework for multimedia content , 2009, ACM Multimedia.

[2]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Comparison of Four Subjective Methods for Image Quality Assessment , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Christoph Fehn,et al.  Depth-image-based rendering (DIBR), compression, and transmission for a new approach on 3D-TV , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  M. Kendall,et al.  ON THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1940 .

[6]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  How to Analyze Paired Comparison Data , 2011 .

[7]  塩井 正宏,et al.  Stereoscopic image processing apparatus, stereoscopic image display apparatus, stereoscopic image providing method and a stereoscopic image processing system, , 2003 .

[8]  Zhi Xue,et al.  Homography matrix genetic consensus estimation algorithm , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing.

[9]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Subjective Quality Evaluation via Paired Comparison: Application to Scalable Video Coding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[10]  傅传诚 Method for adjusting display of stereoscopic images of stereoscopic image display module and related stereoscopic image display module , 2011 .

[11]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Stereoscopic images quality assessment based on deep learning , 2016, 2016 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

[12]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Paired comparison-based subjective quality assessment of stereoscopic images , 2013, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[13]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[14]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Stereoscopic image generation based on depth images for 3D TV , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[15]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Impact of Acquisition Distortion on the Quality of Stereoscopic Images , 2010 .

[16]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.