Role of negative regulation in promoter specificity of the homologous transcriptional activators Ace2p and Swi5p

The Ace2p and Swi5p zinc finger proteins have nearly identical DNA-binding domains, yet in vivo they activate transcription of different genes, CTS1 and HO. We now demonstrate that Ace2p and Swi5p recognize sites in the CTS1 and HO promoters with the same affinities, raising the question of how promoter specificity is achieved by these proteins with similar DNA-binding domains. It has been previously shown that Swi5p binds to the HO promoter cooperatively with the Pho2p (Base2p/Grf10p) homeodomain protein, and we now show that Ace2p does not interact with Pho2p. Analysis of CTS1 promoter fragments inserted into a heterologous promoter identify a sequence 90 bp away from the Ace2p binding sites which is required to prevent activation by Swi5p through these binding sites. These results suggest that a regulatory protein bound to the CTS1 promoter is needed to prevent Swi5p from activating CT1S expression. A genetic screen was conducted to identify suppressor mutations which allow CTS1 expression in the absence of the Ace2p activator. The nce3 mutation suppresses the ace2 defect in CTS1 expression only if the strain contains a functional SWI5 gene, suggesting that NCE3 normally functions to prevent Swi5p from activating CTS1. The role of negative regulators such as NCE3, as well as the previously described SIN5 gene, in determining the promoter specificity of homologous activators is discussed.

[1]  D. Stillman,et al.  Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator. , 1995, Genetics.

[2]  Gail Mandel,et al.  REST: A mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons , 1995, Cell.

[3]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Tissue-specific gene activation by MyoD: determination of specificity by cis-acting repression elements. , 1994, Genes & development.

[4]  S. Dorland,et al.  Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator. , 1994, Genetics.

[5]  I. Cowell,et al.  Repression versus activation in the control of gene transcription. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  D. Stillman,et al.  The Swi5 zinc-finger and Grf10 homeodomain proteins bind DNA cooperatively at the yeast HO promoter. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Thomas,et al.  Thinking about genetic redundancy. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[8]  C. Goutte,et al.  Yeast a1 and alpha 2 homeodomain proteins form a DNA-binding activity with properties distinct from those of either protein. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  D. Stillman,et al.  Identification and Purification of a Protein That Binds DNA Cooperatively with the Yeast SWI5 Protein , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[10]  H. Wang,et al.  Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  K Nasmyth,et al.  SWI5 instability may be necessary but is not sufficient for asymmetric HO expression in yeast. , 1993, Genes & development.

[12]  S. Johnston,et al.  Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a β sheet , 1993, Cell.

[13]  B. M. Herschbach,et al.  Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. , 1993, Annual review of cell biology.

[14]  W. Herr,et al.  Differential positive control by Oct-1 and Oct-2: activation of a transcriptionally silent motif through Oct-1 and VP16 corecruitment. , 1993, Genes & development.

[15]  T. Formosa,et al.  Evidence that POB1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that binds to DNA polymerase alpha, acts in DNA metabolism in vivo , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  D. Stillman,et al.  Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast , 1992, Cell.

[18]  W. Wright.  Muscle basic helix-loop-helix proteins and the regulation of myogenesis. , 1992, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[19]  S. Dorland,et al.  Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. , 1992, Genes & development.

[20]  A. Laughon,et al.  DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[21]  P. Robbins,et al.  Chitinase is required for cell separation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A , 1991, Science.

[23]  D. Thiele,et al.  ACE2, an activator of yeast metallothionein expression which is homologous to SWI5 , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  R. Sikorski,et al.  In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  F. Sherman.  Getting started with yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  R. Rothstein.  Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  C. Lawrence.  Classical mutagenesis techniques. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[28]  P R Nicholson,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene, a negative regulator of HO, contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  David Lydall,et al.  The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: Cell cycle regulation of SWI5 nuclear entry , 1990, Cell.

[30]  R. Renkawitz,et al.  Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. , 1990, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[31]  S. Blacklow,et al.  A reliable method for random mutagenesis: the generation of mutant libraries using spiked oligodeoxyribonucleotide primers. , 1989, Gene.

[32]  M. Levine,et al.  Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters , 1989, Cell.

[33]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1 , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[35]  Rodney Rothstein,et al.  Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA , 1989, Cell.

[36]  R. Miller,et al.  A rapid and convenient method for the preparation and storage of competent bacterial cells. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  A Method for Gene Disruption That Allows Repeated Use of URA3 Selection in the Construction of Multiply Disrupted Yeast Strains , 1987, Genetics.

[38]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: Cis- and Trans-acting regulators , 1987, Cell.

[39]  D. Kinney,et al.  Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. , 1986, Gene.

[40]  L. Breeden,et al.  Regulation of the yeast HO gene. , 1985, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[41]  L. Guarente,et al.  Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  L. Guarente,et al.  Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae , 1984, Cell.

[43]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .