论文信息 - Post-colonial attitudes and the relevance of incommensurability - 字舞流文

Post-colonial attitudes and the relevance of incommensurability

Abstract This paper reflects upon the enduring relevance of Peter Fitzpatrick's analysis of incommensurability in the context of post-colonialism and the lived experiences of Indigenous peoples in the US.

Eve Darian-Smith

[1] P. Fitzpatrick. Necessary fictions: Indigenous claims and the humanity of rights , 2010 .

[2] M. Fletcher. Factbound and Splitless: The Certiorari Process as a Barrier to Justice for Indian Tribes , 2009 .

[3] David E. Wilkins. How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier , 2006 .

[4] Eve Darian-Smith. New Capitalists: Law, Politics, and Identity Surrounding Casino Gaming on Native American Land , 2003 .

[5] P. Fitzpatrick. ‘No Higher Duty’: Mabo and the Failure of Legal Foundation , 2002 .

[6] P. Fitzpatrick,et al. Laws of the postcolonial , 1999 .

[7] Dianne Otto. Subalternity and International Law: the Problems of Global Community and the Incommensurability of Difference , 1996 .

[8] P. Fitzpatrick. Passions out of place: Law, incommensurability and resistance , 1995 .

[9] J. Collier,et al. The Mythology of Modern Law. , 1992 .

[10] Michael G. Kenny,et al. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth- Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art , 1991 .