A postal version of the Barthel Index

The Barthel Index is the best known and most popular activities of daily living (ADL) scale. Many studies have confirmed its validity and it has been validated for many different methods of administration. These include direct observation, interview of patient carer or nurse and telephone. The aim of this study was to devise and test the reliability of a self-completed postal version of the Barthel Index for use in surveys and outcome studies. The items were changed into multiple choice questions, taking into account the published guidelines and knowledge of common areas of confusion when administering the Barthel by interview. The test retest reliability over two weeks of the resulting questionnaire was evaluated using a consecutive series of 21 patients from a stroke register, who had responded without prompting to a postal survey six months after stroke. All the items had κ statistics indicating at least moderate reliability, the toilet and mobility items being the worst. The mean difference in total scores was -0.5 out of 20, standard deviation 2.1. The 95% limits of agreement were -4.6 to 3.6, corresponding to a change in dependence of up to two ADL items. This study demonstrates that the postal self-report questionnaire version of the Barthel is reliable and practical. Further studies are needed to establish its validity in comparison with interview administration.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[3]  M. Law,et al.  A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[5]  J. Osberg,et al.  Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  J. DeLuca,et al.  RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION: XII. Measurement Tools with Application to Brain Injury , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  D Shinar,et al.  Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Willner,et al.  Problems in measurement and evaluation of rehabilitation. , 1962, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N. Taub,et al.  Assessment of Scales of Disability and Handicap for Stroke Patients , 1991, Stroke.

[10]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[11]  J. Alexander,et al.  Characteristics of elderly people admitted to hospital, Part III homes, and sheltered housing. , 1979, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  D. Wade,et al.  Depressed Mood After Stroke , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  D Alden,et al.  A correlation between the Geriatric Depression Scale long and short forms. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[15]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? , 1988, International disability studies.

[16]  D. Wade,et al.  Services for stroke patients one year after stroke. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  D. Barer,et al.  Measurement of activities of daily living , 1989 .

[18]  R. Prescott,et al.  Management of acute stroke in the elderly: follow-up of a controlled trial. , 1980, British medical journal.

[19]  A. Silman,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. , 1992, BMJ.