Life cycle assessment for soil stabilization dosages: A study for the Paraguayan Chaco

Geotechnical engineering can account for a considerable portion of the environmental impact in infrastructure and construction projects. As a result, sustainability is increasingly becoming a key research topic in this area. This paper assesses the environmental impact of clay-lime blends for the Paraguayan Chaco region. More specifically, it compares distinct dosages to attain a target strength (unconfined compressive strength and splitting tensile strength) and stiffness (initial shear modulus) using life cycle assessment (LCA). Seven impact categories were considered: acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, depletion of abiotic resources, stratospheric ozone depletion, global warming, and embodied energy. For all target values of strength and stiffness examined, low-binder/high-density dosages have a lower impact across all categories compared to high-binder/low-density dosages. More specifically, minimal impact across all categories is attained when the smallest binder content (required to attain a target strength or stiffness) is used. Changes in binder content and density produce major increases in three categories: energy consumption, global warming, and photochemical oxidation. Lime production accounts for more than 75% of the total energy, greenhouse gases emission, and photochemical oxidation for each of the blends examined. This supports previous research, which shows that materials accounts for a considerable part of energy consumption in geotechnical works. As a result, minimizing binder content and maximizing density are main strategies to create more sustainable dosages for soil stabilization.

[1]  Pedro Domingos Marques Prietto,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF COMPACTED SOIL-FLY ASH-CARBIDE LIME MIXTURES , 2001 .

[2]  A. Al-Tabbaa,et al.  A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Bryan A. McCabe,et al.  An embodied carbon and embodied energy appraisal of a section of Irish motorway constructed in peatlands , 2015 .

[4]  Marco Guerrieri,et al.  Environmentally appraising different pavement and construction scenarios: A comparative analysis for a typical local road , 2015 .

[5]  N. Consoli,et al.  Parameters controlling stiffness and strength of artificially cemented soils , 2012 .

[6]  Ian Jefferson,et al.  Emissions assessment related to vibro stone columns , 2010 .

[7]  F. Ahmad,et al.  Assessing the potential reuse of recycled glass fibre in problematic soil applications , 2012 .

[8]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  N. Consoli,et al.  Mohr–Coulomb failure envelopes of lime-treated soils , 2014 .

[10]  Nilo Cesar Consoli,et al.  Variables Governing Strength of Compacted Soil–Fly Ash–Lime Mixtures , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin S. Richards,et al.  Critical appraisal of piping phenomena in earth dams , 2007 .

[12]  N. Consoli,et al.  Durability, Strength, and Stiffness of Dispersive Clay–Lime Blends , 2016 .

[13]  David Chapman,et al.  Sustainable Geotechnical Design , 2010 .

[14]  F. G. Bell,et al.  Dispersive soils: a review from a South African perspective , 1994, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[15]  O G Ingles,et al.  Soil stabilization: principles and practice, , 1972 .

[16]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[17]  David Chapman,et al.  Why is Sustainability Important in Geotechnical Engineering , 2008 .

[18]  Nilo Cesar Consoli,et al.  Circular footings on a cemented layer above weak foundation soil , 2005 .

[19]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Hemanta Hazarika,et al.  Evaluation of the mechanical properties of recycled glass fibers-derived three dimensional geomaterial for ground improvement , 2013 .

[21]  Lee W. Abramson,et al.  Ground control and improvement , 1994 .

[22]  Wahidul K. Biswas.  Carbon footprint and embodied energy assessment of a civil works program in a residential estate of Western Australia , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Yue Huang,et al.  Development of a life cycle assessment tool for construction and maintenance of asphalt pavements , 2009 .

[24]  Robin Fell,et al.  Investigation of Rate of Erosion of Soils in Embankment Dams , 2004 .

[25]  James L. Sherard,et al.  Pinhole Test for Identifying Dispersive Soils , 1976 .

[26]  D. Egan,et al.  Demonstrating environmental benefits of ground improvement , 2010 .

[27]  Pedro Domingos Marques Prietto,et al.  Variables Controlling Stiffness and Strength of Lime-Stabilized Soils , 2011 .

[28]  Nilo Cesar Consoli,et al.  Key parameters dictating strength of lime/cement-treated soils , 2009 .

[29]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1948 .

[30]  Stephan A. Jefferis,et al.  Moving Towards Sustainability in Geotechnical Engineering , 2008 .

[31]  M. Coop,et al.  Influence of Cement-Voids Ratio on Stress-Dilatancy Behavior of Artificially Cemented Sand , 2012 .

[32]  K. S. Heineck,et al.  Key Parameters for the Strength Control of Lime Stabilized Soils , 2009 .