Design principles for effective physics instruction: A case from physics and everyday thinking

Although several successful inquiry-based physics and physical science curricula have been developed, little has been published that describes the development of these curricula in terms of their basic design principles. We describe the research-based design principles used in the development of one such curriculum and how these principles are reflected in its pedagogical structure. A case study drawn from an early pilot implementation illustrates how the design principles play out in a practical classroom setting. Extensive evaluation has shown that this curriculum enhances students’ conceptual understanding and improves students’ attitudes about science.

[1]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[2]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[3]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings: Correlating Student Beliefs With Student Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey , 2005 .

[4]  V. Otero,et al.  Attitudinal Gains across Multiple Universities Using the Physics and Everyday Thinking Curriculum. , 2008 .

[5]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[6]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[7]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research , 1996 .

[8]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Preservice elementary teachers' views of their students' prior knowledge of science , 2008 .

[9]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[10]  N. Talbott,et al.  Developing an Inquiry‐Based Physical Science Course For Preservice Elementary Teachers , 2006 .

[11]  N. Finkelstein,et al.  Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving , 2008 .

[12]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap , 1991 .

[13]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .

[14]  C. E. Wieman,et al.  Correlating Student Attitudes With Student Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey , 2004 .

[15]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  New Instrument for Measuring Student Beliefs about Physics and Learning Physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. , 2006 .

[16]  G. Forman,et al.  Constructivism in the computer age , 1988 .

[17]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[18]  Jonathan Tuminaro,et al.  Elements of a Cognitive Model of Physics Problem Solving: Epistemic Games. , 2007 .

[19]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[20]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[21]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .