I am Robot, Your Health Adviser for Older Adults: Do You Trust My Advice?

[1]  X. Ren,et al.  Effects of Social Robotics in Promoting Physical Activity in the Shared Workspace , 2022, Sustainability.

[2]  D. Manzey,et al.  Why Context Matters: The Influence of Application Domain on Preferred Degree of Anthropomorphism and Gender Attribution in Human–Robot Interaction , 2022, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Jaap Ham,et al.  More than advice , 2021, Interaction Studies.

[4]  G. Pietro,et al.  A conversational agent for querying Italian Patient Information Leaflets and improving health literacy , 2021, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  Yongjun Sung,et al.  AI-powered recommendations: the roles of perceived similarity and psychological distance on persuasion , 2021, International Journal of Advertising.

[6]  Wolfgang Minker,et al.  Small Talk with a Robot? The Impact of Dialog Content, Talk Initiative, and Gaze Behavior of a Social Robot on Trust, Acceptance, and Proximity , 2021, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  What Makes a Robot Social? A Review of Social Robots from Science Fiction to a Home or Hospital Near You , 2021, Current Robotics Reports.

[8]  Alessandro Di Nuovo,et al.  The Role of Personality Factors and Empathy in the Acceptance and Performance of a Social Robot for Psychometric Evaluations , 2020, Robotics.

[9]  O. Bargain,et al.  Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[10]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Persuasive Robots Acceptance Model (PRAM): Roles of Social Responses Within the Acceptance Model of Persuasive Robots , 2020, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance , 2019, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Nicholas Hertz,et al.  Good advice is beyond all price, but what if it comes from a machine? , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[13]  Jaap Ham,et al.  The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Jean-Christophe Giger,et al.  Predicting intention to work with social robots at anticipation stage: Assessing the role of behavioral desire and anticipated emotions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  M. Vizcaychipi,et al.  Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care , 2018, BMJ Open.

[16]  Emilia I. Barakova,et al.  Socially grounded game strategy enhances bonding and perceived smartness of a humanoid robot , 2018, Connect. Sci..

[17]  Jiliang Tang,et al.  A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontiers , 2017, SKDD.

[18]  Gary Anthes,et al.  Artificial intelligence poised to ride a new wave , 2017, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Holly A. H. Handley,et al.  Trust and the Compliance–Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[20]  M. Al-Taee,et al.  Acceptability of Robot Assistant in Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Children. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  Eva Wiese,et al.  Trust in Automated Agents is Modulated by the Combined Influence of Agent and Task Type , 2016 .

[22]  Samuel S. Monfort,et al.  Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[23]  Olivier Renaud,et al.  A general permutation approach for analyzing repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-model designs , 2015 .

[24]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[25]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[26]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[27]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[28]  Richard Pak,et al.  Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults , 2012, Ergonomics.

[29]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[30]  A. Furnham,et al.  A literature review of the anchoring effect , 2011 .

[31]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Effects of specialization in computers, web sites, and web agents on e-commerce trust , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Conghui Liu,et al.  Human-Machine Trust Interaction: A Technical Overview , 2010, Int. J. Dependable Trust. Inf. Syst..

[33]  S. Bonaccio,et al.  What types of advice do decision-makers prefer? , 2010 .

[34]  Lyn M. Van Swol,et al.  The Effects of Confidence and Advisor Motives on Advice Utilization , 2009, Commun. Res..

[35]  Joel A Dubin,et al.  Advantages of mixed effects models over traditional ANOVA models in developmental studies: a worked example in a mouse model of fetal alcohol syndrome. , 2007, Developmental psychobiology.

[36]  D. Wiegmann,et al.  Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review , 2007 .

[37]  S. Bonaccio,et al.  Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences , 2006 .

[38]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Why the Unskilled are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight Among the Incompetent , 2006, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[39]  Douglas A. Wiegmann,et al.  Cognitive Anchoring on Self-Generated Decisions Reduces Operator Reliance on Automated Diagnostic Aids , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[40]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Commun. Res..

[41]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[42]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[43]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[45]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[46]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[47]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[48]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  The social power of a uniform. , 1974 .

[49]  Olivier Renaud,et al.  Permutation Tests for Regression, ANOVA, and Comparison of Signals: The permuco Package , 2021, J. Stat. Softw..

[50]  Van Swol,et al.  Forecasting another’s enjoyment versus giving the right answer: Trust, shared values, task effects, and confidence in improving the acceptance of advice , 2011 .

[51]  D. Moore,et al.  Effects of Task Difficulty on Use of Advice , 2007 .

[52]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[53]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge's Point of View , 1979 .