Novel, Bidirectional, Variable-Camber Airfoil via Macro-Fiber Composite Actuators

This study aims to enable solid-state aerodynamic force generation in high-dynamic-pressure airflow. A novel, high-load-output, bidirectional variable-camber airfoil employing a type of piezoceramic composite actuator known as a Macro-Fiber Composite is presented. The novel airfoil employs two active surfaces and a single four-bar (box) mechanism as the internal structure. The unique choice of boundary conditions allows variable and smooth deformation in both directions from a flat camber line. The paper focuses on actuation modeling and response characterization under aerodynamic loads. A parametric study of aerodynamic response is employed to optimize the kinematic parameters of the airfoil. The concept is fabricated by implementing eight Macro-Fiber Composite 8557-P1-type actuators in a bimorph configuration to construct the active surfaces. The box mechanism generates deflection and camber change as predicted. Wind-tunnel experiments are conducted on a 12.6% maximum thickness, 127 mm chord airfoil. Aerodynamic and structural performance results are presented for a flow rate of 15 m /s and a Reynolds number of 127,000. Nonlinear effects due to aerodynamic and piezoceramic hysteresis are identified and discussed. A lift coefficient change of 1.54 is observed purely due to voltage actuation. Results are compared with conventional, zero-camber NACA and other airfoils. A 72% increase in the lift-curve slope is achieved when compared with a NACA 0009 airfoil.

[1]  E. O. Rogers,et al.  Applied Aerodynamics of Circulation Control Airfoils and Rotors , 1985 .

[2]  Luther N. Jenkins,et al.  Stability and Control Properties of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle , 2001 .

[3]  A. D. Young,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[4]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Development, control, and test results of high-rate hingeless trailing edge-control surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 wind tunnel model , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[5]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An experimental and analytical study of a flow vectoring airfoil via macro-fiber-composite actuators , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Morphing wing aerodynamic control via macro-fiber-composite actuators in an unmanned aircraft , 2007 .

[7]  T. J. Mueller,et al.  Experimental studies of the Eppler 61 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers , 1982 .

[8]  Chuan He,et al.  Plasma Actuators for Hingeless Aerodynamic Control of an Unmanned Air Vehicle , 2006 .

[9]  David Graziosi,et al.  Inflatable and Rigidizable Wing Components for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2003 .

[10]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  M. Drela.  XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 1989 .

[12]  Nan Jou Pern,et al.  Characterization of Zero Mass Flux Flow Control for Separation Control of an Adaptive Airfoil , 2006 .

[13]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Engineering Feasibility of Induced Strain Actuators for Rotor Blade Active Vibration Control , 1994, Smart Structures.

[14]  W Moses Robert,et al.  Evaluation of New Actuators in a Buffet Loads Environment , 2001 .

[15]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Morphing wing flight control via postbuckled precompressed piezoelectric actuators , 2007 .

[16]  James E. Murray,et al.  Ground and Flight Evaluation of a Small-Scale Inflatable-Winged Aircraft , 2002 .

[17]  William Crowther,et al.  Towards a practical piezoceramic diaphragm based synthetic jet actuator for high subsonic applications - Effect of chamber and orifice depth on actuator peak velocity , 2006 .

[18]  Rick Lind,et al.  Time-varying dynamics of a micro air vehicle with variable-sweep morphing , 2009 .

[19]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Flexible-wing-based Micro Air Vehicles , 2002 .

[20]  E. Crawley,et al.  Static Aeroelastic Control Using Strain Actuated Adaptive Structures , 1991 .

[21]  Mujahid Abdulrahim,et al.  ROLL CONTROL FOR A MICRO AIR VEHICLE USING ACTIVE WING MORPHING , 2003 .

[22]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Deformation for Flexible-Wing Micro Air Vehicles , 2005 .

[23]  Tim Smith,et al.  Morphing Inflatable Wing Development for Compact Package Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Novel Aerodynamic Vectoring Control Airfoil via Macro- Fiber-Composite Actuators , 2008 .

[25]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Airfoils at low speeds , 1989 .

[26]  M. Selig.  Summary of low speed airfoil data , 1995 .

[27]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Morphing wing micro-air-vehicles via macro-fiber-composite actuators , 2007 .

[28]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[29]  Andrew Simpson,et al.  Aerodynamic Control of an Inflatable Wing Using Wing Warping , 2005 .

[30]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  Enabling Flow Control Technology for Low Speed UAVs , 2005 .

[31]  Dan Bugajski,et al.  Smart Vanes for UCAV Engine Applications , 2004 .

[32]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines , 2004 .

[33]  George A. Lesieutre,et al.  Can a Coupling Coefficient of a Piezoelectric Device be Higher Than Those of Its Active Material? , 1997, Smart Structures.

[34]  Onur Bilgen,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Hysteresis in Piezocomposite Airfoils Using Preisach Model , 2011 .

[35]  R. Williams.  Nonlinear Mechanical and Actuation Characterization of Piezoceramic Fiber Composites , 1999 .

[36]  S. Hanagud,et al.  Adaptive airfoils for helicopters , 1993, Smart Structures.

[37]  W. Keats Wilkie,et al.  Method of Fabricating NASA-Standard Macro-Fiber Composite Piezoelectric Actuators , 2003 .

[38]  E. C. Maskell,et al.  A Theory of the Blockage Effects on Bluff Bodies and Stalled Wings in a Closed Wind Tunnel , 1963 .

[39]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Modeling and Flight Control of Large-Scale Morphing Aircraft , 2007 .

[40]  Walter G Vincenti,et al.  Wall interference in a two-dimensional-flow wind tunnel, with consideration of the effect of compressibility , 1944 .

[41]  Sathya Hanagud,et al.  Structure-control interaction and the design of piezoceramic actuated adaptive airfoils , 1994 .

[42]  Paul H. Mirick,et al.  Low-cost piezocomposite actuator for structural control applications , 2000, Smart Structures.

[43]  R Waszak Martin,et al.  Stability and Control Properties of an Aeroelastic Fixed Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle , 2001 .

[44]  M. Amitay,et al.  Aspects of low- and high-frequency actuation for aerodynamic flow control , 2005 .

[45]  Gabriel Eduardo Torres,et al.  Aerodynamics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers with applications to micro air vehicle design , 2001 .

[46]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Review of Smart-Materials Actuation Solutions for Aeroelastic and Vibration Control , 2000 .

[47]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  Flow Control And Lift Enhancement Using Plasma Actuators , 2005 .

[48]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Macro-Fiber Composite actuated simply supported thin airfoils , 2010 .

[49]  Dae-Kwan Kim,et al.  Smart flapping wing using macrofiber composite actuators , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[50]  Tim Smith,et al.  Inflatable and Rigidizable Wings for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2003 .