Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.

A digital system for chest radiography based on a large image intensifier was compared to a conventional film-screen system. The digital system was optimized with regard to spatial and contrast resolution and dose. The images were digitally processed for contrast and edge enhancement. A simulated pneumothorax and two simulated nodules were positioned over the lungs and the mediastinum of an anthropomorphic phantom. Observer performance was evaluated with ROC analysis. Five observers assessed the processed digital images and the conventional full-size radiographs. The time spent viewing the full-size radiographs and the digital images was recorded. For the simulated pneumothorax, the results showed perfect performance for the full-size radiographs and detectability was high also for the processed digital images. No significant difference in the detectability of the simulated nodules was seen between the two imaging systems. The results for the digital images showed a significantly improved detectability for the nodules in the mediastinum as compared to a previous ROC study where no optimization and image processing was available. No significant difference in detectability was seen between the former and the present ROC study for small nodules in the lung. No difference was seen in the time spent assessing the conventional full-size radiographs and the digital images. The study indicates that processed digital images produced by a large image intensifier are equal in image quality to conventional full-size radiographs for low-contrast objects such as nodules.

[1]  W D Foley,et al.  Pneumothorax and other lung diseases: effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs. , 1988, Radiology.

[2]  U. Tylén,et al.  Radiographic reporting directly from the TV monitor of a digital chest radiography system. , 1991, European journal of radiology.

[3]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. , 1983, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[4]  L B Lusted,et al.  Radiographic applications of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. , 1974, Radiology.

[5]  Kunio Doi,et al.  The Effect Of Digital Unsharp Masking On The Detectability Of Interstitial Infiltrates And Pneumothoraces , 1985, Medical Imaging.

[6]  U. Tylén,et al.  Digital Chest Radiography with a Large Image Intensifier , 1989, Acta radiologica.

[7]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[8]  W. Foley,et al.  The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[9]  G G Cox,et al.  A digital radiology imaging system: description and clinical evaluation. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  K. Doi,et al.  Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. , 1986, Radiology.

[11]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Perception of simulated lung lesions. , 1978, Investigative radiology.

[12]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Subtle lung cancers: impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digitized chest radiographs. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[14]  Kunio Doi,et al.  High quality digital radiographic images , 1983 .

[15]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effect of size and position on chest lesion detection. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W. Dölken,et al.  Digital Image Intensifier Radiography and Film Screen Systems: Spatial Resolution, Contrast Detail Diagrams, Dose Measurements and Detectability of Pulmonary Nodules , 1989 .

[17]  Kundel Hl,et al.  Visual perception and image display terminals , 1986 .

[18]  S Kheddache,et al.  Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom. , 1989, European journal of radiology.

[19]  Kunio Doi,et al.  The Effect Of Pixel Size On The Detection Rate Of Early Pulmonary Sarcoidosis In Digital Chest Radiographic Systems , 1984, Medical Imaging.

[20]  P G Herman,et al.  Accuracy and its relationship to experience in the interpretation of chest radiographs. , 1975, Investigative radiology.

[21]  G D Gillan,et al.  Development of a radiographic chest phantom with disease simulation. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[22]  C E Ravin,et al.  Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance. , 1988, Radiology.

[23]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[24]  P M Lams,et al.  Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. , 1986, Radiology.

[25]  B B Hobbs,et al.  Detection accuracy in chest radiography. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  R. G. Fraser,et al.  Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. , 1986, Radiology.

[27]  G W Seeley,et al.  Total digital radiology department: spatial resolution requirements. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  J E Angelhed,et al.  Digital chest radiography: should images be presented in negative or positive mode? , 1991, European journal of radiology.

[29]  W. E. Miller,et al.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. , 1983, Radiology.

[30]  C E Metz,et al.  Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.

[31]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection. , 1988, Radiology.

[32]  F A DiBianca,et al.  The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs. , 1981, Radiology.