A laboratory study of NMR relaxation times and pore coupling in heterogeneous media

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation times of geologic materials are closely related to pore geometry. In heterogeneous media, however, the details of this relationship are poorly understood because of a phenomenon known as pore coupling, which arises when diffusing protons sample multiple pores before relaxing. Laboratory experiments allow us to explore whether surface geochemistry can influence pore coupling and how this process affects the observed relaxation-time distribution. Measurements of the NMR response for microporous silica gel packs, treated with varying amounts of surface-coating iron, demonstrate that samples with less iron exhibit stronger pore coupling than those with abundant iron. When pore coupling is strong, the relaxation-time distribution grossly misrepresents the underlying bimodal pore-size distribution of micropores and macropores. Specifically, the bimodal relaxation-time distribution becomes merged and the relative amplitude of the peaks fails to reflect the true macropore and micropore volume. A reduction in pore coupling, observed with increasing iron content, is attributed to a decrease in the distance protons are able to diffuse before relaxing. Basic parameters describing the shape of the relaxation-time distributions for this range of samples are well-predicted by a 1D analytical model. Experimental results conclusively demonstrate that surface geochemistry is an important factor determining the degree to which pore coupling occurs and illustrate how this phenomenon can affect the interpretation of NMR relaxation measurements in heterogeneous porous media.

[1]  H. Carr,et al.  DIFFUSION AND NUCLEAR SPIN RELAXATION IN WATER , 1958 .

[2]  D. O. Seevers,et al.  A Nuclear Magnetic Method For Determining The Permeability Of Sandstones , 1966 .

[3]  Stephen D. Senturia,et al.  Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation of Liquids Confined in Porous Solids , 1970 .

[4]  K. Brownstein,et al.  Importance of classical diffusion in NMR studies of water in biological cells , 1979 .

[5]  Morrell H. Cohen,et al.  Nuclear magnetic relaxation and the internal geometry of sedimentary rocks , 1982 .

[6]  W. E. Kenyon,et al.  A Three-Part Study of NMR Longitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones , 1988 .

[7]  W. Halperin,et al.  Application of nuclear magnetic resonance pore structure analysis to porous silica glass , 1989 .

[8]  M. Z. Kalam,et al.  Pore-size distributions from nuclear magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation measurements of fluid-saturated porous solids. II. Applications to reservoir core samples , 1990 .

[9]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Investigation of analysis techniques for complicated NMR relaxation data , 1991 .

[10]  Mehta,et al.  Vibrated powders: Structure, correlations, and dynamics. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[11]  Todd H. Skaggs,et al.  Probing soil and aquifer material porosity with nuclear magnetic resonance , 1993 .

[12]  G. C. Borgia,et al.  Developments in core analysis by NMR measurements. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Kleinberg,et al.  Effect of Paramagnetic Ions on NMR Relaxation of Fluids at Solid Surfaces , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series A.

[14]  Andrew C. Chang,et al.  Quantification of microporosity by nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation of water imbibed in porous media , 1997 .

[15]  P. Dove,et al.  Microbially catalyzed dissolution of iron and aluminum oxyhydroxide mineral surface coatings , 1997 .

[16]  Terizhandur S. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Forward Models For Nuclear Magnetic Resonance In Carbonate Rocks , 1998 .

[17]  R. Knight,et al.  Detecting sorbed hydrocarbons in a porous medium using proton nuclear magnetic resonance. , 2000 .

[18]  R. Knight,et al.  Paramagnetic effects of iron(III) species on nuclear magnetic relaxation of fluid protons in porous media. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[19]  M. Herron,et al.  A Model-Based Interpretation Methodology for Evaluating Carbonate Reservoirs , 2001 .

[20]  P. Sen,et al.  Characterization of coupled pore systems from the diffusion eigenspectrum , 2002 .

[21]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements , 2002 .

[22]  C. Torres‐Verdín,et al.  Analysis Of Nmr Diffusion Coupling Effects In Two-Phase Carbonate Rocks: Comparison Of Measurements With Monte Carlo Simulations , 2002 .

[23]  G. Hirasaki,et al.  Diffusional coupling between micro and macroporosity for NMR relaxation in sandstones and carbonates , 2005 .

[24]  Marian Hertrich,et al.  Imaging of groundwater with nuclear magnetic resonance , 2008 .

[25]  David O. Walsh,et al.  Multi-channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations , 2008 .