The Impact of Norms on the Outcome of Children Born Very-Preterm when Using the Bayley-III: Differences between US and German Norms

Background: The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III) are widely used to assess the development of children born preterm. However, it is still unclear whether US norms are adequate for use in other populations. In 2014, the German version of the Bayley-III with German norms was published. Objectives: We aimed to compare the performance of very-preterm infants at one, two, and three years of age using the German versus US norms of the Bayley-III. Methods: All children born prior to 32 weeks of gestational age during 2012 and 2015 and taking part in the follow-up program of the Medical University of Vienna were assessed and scored according to both German and US norms by two expert clinical psychologists at the age of one, two, and three years of age. Results: In total, 843 tests were obtained from 450 children. When looking at scaled scores for cognitive, language, and motor outcomes, preterm children achieved significantly lower scores in nearly all subtests with the German as compared to the US norms. In addition, the proportion of impaired children scoring < 1 standard deviation (SD) and < 2 SD below the norm was significantly higher in nearly all subtests when using the German compared to the US norms (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Applying German and US norms of the Bayley-III leads to different outcomes in very-preterm children, and these differences are statistically significant and clinically relevant. Thus, comparisons of outcomes of very-preterm children using culturally specific norms are problematic, and these findings have to be considered.

[1]  P. Anderson,et al.  Assessing developmental delay in early childhood — concerns with the Bayley-III scales , 2017, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[2]  A. V. van Baar,et al.  Performance of Dutch Children on the Bayley III: A Comparison Study of US and Dutch Norms , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  S. Cole,et al.  Validity of US norms for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III in Malawian children. , 2014, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[4]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used? , 2014, Pediatric Research.

[5]  N. Badawi,et al.  A comparison of the performance of healthy Australian 3-year-olds with the standardised norms of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (version-III) , 2014, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[6]  S. Jeng,et al.  A psychometric study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 3rd Edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  Charles R. Bauer,et al.  Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. , 2012, The Journal of pediatrics.

[8]  N. Marlow,et al.  Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children. , 2012, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  Sarah J. Erickson,et al.  Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III cognitive scale: are we measuring the same thing? , 2012, Acta paediatrica.

[10]  N. Badawi,et al.  Brief Report: Performance of Australian Children at One Year of Age on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Version III) , 2010 .

[11]  Gehan Roberts,et al.  Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. , 2010, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[12]  Stefano Di Girolamo,et al.  Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review , 2010, Child's Nervous System.

[13]  Gary J. Robertson,et al.  Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development , 2017 .

[14]  J. Oosterlaan,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Very Preterm and/or Very Low Birth Weight Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[15]  A. van Wassenaer,et al.  Applying Dutch and US versions of the BSID‐II in Dutch children born preterm leads to different outcomes , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[16]  Samantha Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and behavioural outcomes following very preterm birth. , 2007, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[17]  B. Vohr,et al.  Longitudinal multicenter follow-up of high-risk infants: why, who, when, and what to assess. , 2003, Seminars in perinatology.

[18]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  G. Aylward Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development , 2017 .