Signalling and Sexual Conflict: Female Spiders Use Stridulation to Inform Males of Sexual Receptivity

The use of acoustic signals by males during courtship and mating is well known. Nevertheless, their association with female unwillingness to mate is much less studied. In spiders, stridulation during sexual interactions is relatively common in some groups, but mainly restricted to males. In the pholcid spider Holocnemus pluchei, both sexes have stridulatory organs. The aims of the present work were (1) to establish whether female stridulation occurs during intra- and inter-sexual interactions, (2) to determine whether female reproductive status affects the likelihood that she will stridulate and (3) to determine whether female stridulation is influenced by male sexual behaviour. We found that female stridulation usually occurs both during intrasexual interactions and, most frequently, during intersexual interactions. Females with more previous matings stridulated more frequently. Stridulation intensity was higher in females that did not accept new copulations compared with those that copulated. Female stridulation did not vary in elaborated and non-elaborated courtship. Thus, females use stridulation to communicate levels of sexual receptivity. It is also possible that females use stridulation to indirectly assess male ability to persist and persuade.

[1]  A. Peretti,et al.  Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  A. Aisenberg Male Performance and Body Size Affect Female Re‐Mating Occurrence in the Orb‐Web Spider Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) , 2009 .

[3]  F. G. Costa,et al.  Persistence of sexual reluctance in mated females and the importance of regular copulation in a wolf spider , 2008 .

[4]  A. Córdoba‐Aguilar,et al.  On the value of fine-scaled behavioural observations for studies of sexual coercion , 2007 .

[5]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Appearances deceive: female “resistance” behaviour in a sepsid fly is not a test of male ability to hold on , 2007 .

[6]  A. Peretti,et al.  Sexual coercion does not exclude luring behavior in the climbing camel-spider Oltacola chacoensis (Arachnida, Solifugae, Ammotrechidae) , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[7]  T. Chapman Evolutionary Conflicts of Interest between Males and Females , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  A. Peretti,et al.  Copulatory dialogue: female spiders sing during copulation to influence male genitalic movements , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  A. Peretti,et al.  Female control of mating sequences in the mountain scorpion Zabius fuscus: males do not use coercion as a response to unreceptive females , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  E. Jakob Individual decisions and group dynamics: why pholcid spiders join and leave groups , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Lorenzo,et al.  The sexual behaviour of Panstrongylus megistus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): an experimental study. , 2004, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

[12]  O. Martin,et al.  Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylli (Diptera: Sepsidae) , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[13]  T. Chapman,et al.  Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice , 2003 .

[14]  O. Martin,et al.  Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[15]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  J. Henschel LONG-DISTANCE WANDERING AND MATING BY THE DANCING WHITE LADY SPIDER (LEUCORCHESTRIS ARENICOLA) (ARANEAE, SPARASSIDAE) ACROSS NAMIB DUNES , 2002 .

[17]  G. Uhl,et al.  Determinants of paternity success in the spider Pholcus phalangioides (Pholcidae: Araneae): the role of male and female mating behaviour , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  P. E. Schilman,et al.  Comparison of disturbance stridulations in five species of triatominae bugs. , 2001, Acta tropica.

[19]  P. E. Schilman,et al.  Two different vibratory signals in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: reduviidae). , 2000, Acta tropica.

[20]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. , 2000 .

[21]  E. Jakob,et al.  Ontogenetic Shifts in the Costs of Living in Groups: Focal Observations of a Pholcid Spider (Holocnemus pluchei) , 2000 .

[22]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Courtship, copulation, and genital mechanics in Physocyclus globosus (Araneae, Pholcidae) , 1997 .

[23]  E. Jakob,et al.  Last-male sperm priority in a haplogyne spider (Araneae: Pholcidae) : Correlations between female morphology and patterns of sperm usage , 1997 .

[24]  L. Simmons,et al.  Reproductive strategies of the crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1997 .

[25]  F. Roces,et al.  Different stridulatory vibrations during sexual behaviour and disturbance in the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) , 1996 .

[26]  Gabriele Uhl,et al.  Stridulation in Palpimanus gibbulus Dufour (Araneae: Palpimanidae) , 1996 .

[27]  B. Huber Copulatory Mechanism in Holocnemus pluchei and Pholcus opilionoides, With Notes on Male Cheliceral Apophyses and Stridulatory Organs in Pholcidae (Araneae) , 1995 .

[28]  L. Rowe,et al.  Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  C. Lazzari,et al.  Sexual behaviour and stridulation during mating in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). , 1994, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

[30]  E. Jakob CONTESTS OVER PREY BY GROUP-LIVING PHOLCIDS (HOLOCNEMUS PLUCHEI) , 1994 .

[31]  R. Jackson,et al.  Anti‐predator defences of a web‐building spider, Holocnemus pluchei (Araneae, Pholcidae) , 1993 .

[32]  R. Jackson Predator‐prey interactions between web‐invading jumping spiders and a web‐building spider, Holocnemus pluchei (Araneae, Pholcidae) , 1992 .

[33]  L. Rowe Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  E. Jakob Costs and benefits of group living for pholcid spiderlings: losing food, saving silk , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  T. Christenson Natural selection and reproduction: A study of the golden orb-weaving spider. , 1990 .

[36]  H. Dingle,et al.  Food Level and Life History Characteristics in a Pholcid Spider (Holocnemus Pluchei) , 1990 .

[37]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[38]  S. Austad 7 – Evolution of Sperm Priority Patterns in Spiders , 1984 .

[39]  G. Uetz,et al.  Chapter 4 Acoustic Communication and Reproductive Isolation in Spiders , 1982 .

[40]  M. Hinds,et al.  Quantity of the male ejaculate influenced by female unreceptivity in the fly, Culicoides melleus. , 1975, Journal of insect physiology.