A National Renewable Portfolio Standard? Not Practical
暂无分享,去创建一个
A discussion of renewable energy seems to addle the brains of many sensible people, leading them to propose policies that are bad engineering and science or have a foundation in yearning for utopia. For example, Michael Bloomberg, self-made billionaire and mayor of New York City, proposed putting wind turbines on the tops of skyscrapers and bridges. No need to ask the engineers whether the structures could bear the strain or whether there were good wind resources. Disagreeing with the mayor, the Alliance for Clean Energy New York said, “New York is really a solar city.“ Like Mayor Bloomberg and the Alliance, 25 governors, and more than 100 members of Congress, we love renewable energy. However, even this wonderful idea requires a hard look to see what is sensible now and why some current and proposed policies are likely to be costly, anger many people, and undermine the reliability of our electricity system. Congress needs to understand some facts before voting for a national renewable portfolio standard (RPS).
[1] S Pacala,et al. Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.
[2] David W. Keith,et al. Fossil Fuels Without CO2 Emissions , 1998, Science.
[3] Jay Apt,et al. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy? , 2005, Environmental science & technology.
[4] M. G. Morgan,et al. Promoting Low-Carbon Electricity Production , 2006 .