Differences in Dermoscopic Images from Nonpolarized Dermoscope and Polarized Dermoscope Influence the Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence Level: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated differences in colors and dermoscopic structures observed with polarized dermoscopes (PDs) and nonpolarized dermoscopes (NPDs). OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate whether diagnosis and diagnostic confidence changes when viewing dermoscopic images from NPDs and PDs. METHODS A total of 100 dermatologists participated in the study. Twenty-five pigmented lesions were shown in the study, consisting of 7 seborrheic keratoses (SK), 3 basal cell carcinomas, 2 atypical nevi, 5 malignant melanomas (MM), 3 dermatofibromas, 3 blue nevi, and 2 hemangiomas. Two images of each lesion (one NPD and one PD) were included. The McNemar test and paired t-test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS Ninety-one participants completed the study. Significant differences in the diagnoses were observed for the SK, atypical nevus, and MM images. Seventy-five percent and 59% of the final participants correctly diagnosed SK when presented with the NPD and PD images, respectively. For MM, 23 and 34% made the correct diagnoses with the NPD and PD images, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Viewing lesions with NPD versus PD can affect the diagnosis and diagnostic confidence of physicians that are novices with dermoscopy. Further studies including physicians at different expertise levels and a larger sample of lesions are needed to further explore the differences.

[1]  R. MacKie Cutaneous microscopy in vivo as an aid to preoperative assessment of pigmented lesions of the skin. , 1972, British Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[2]  A. Marghoob,et al.  Conventional and polarized dermoscopy features of dermatofibroma. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[3]  Stephen W Dusza,et al.  Level of Confidence in Diagnosis: Clinical Examination Versus Dermoscopy Examination , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[4]  Roman Kuranov,et al.  Complementary use of cross-polarization and standard OCT for differential diagnosis of pathological tissues. , 2002, Optics express.

[5]  R P Braun,et al.  An evaluation of dermoscopy fluids and application techniques , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[6]  H. Kittler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. , 2007, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  R. Anderson Polarized light examination and photography of the skin. , 1991, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  P. Aegerter,et al.  Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[10]  Ashfaq A Marghoob,et al.  Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  R. MacKie,et al.  AN AID TO THE PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PIGMENTED LESIONS OF THE SKIN , 1971, The British journal of dermatology.