When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills.

Two experiments examined the impact of attention on sensorimotor skills. In Experiment 1, experienced golfers putted under dual-task conditions designed to distract attention from putting and under skill-focused conditions that prompted attention to step-by-step putting performance. Dual-task condition putting was more accurate. In Experiment 2, right-footed novice and experienced soccer players dribbled through a slalom course under dual-task or skill-focused conditions. When using their dominant right foot, experts again performed better in the dual-task condition. However, when using their less proficient left foot, experts performed better in the skill-focused condition. Novices performed better under skill-focus regardless of foot. Whereas novices and the less-proficient performances of experts benefit from online attentional monitoring of step-by-step performance, high-level skill execution is harmed.

[1]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  G. Wulf,et al.  Attentional Focus in Complex Skill Learning , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  S. McPherson,et al.  Expert-Novice Differences in Planning Strategies during Collegiate Singles Tennis Competition , 2000 .

[6]  W. Helsen,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Skilled Perception and Performance in Sport , 1999 .

[7]  W. Prinz,et al.  Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[9]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[11]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Postural asymmetries and language lateralization in humans (Homo sapiens). , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  G. Engel,et al.  Neuropsychology , 1994, Schizophrenia Research.

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[14]  Rich S. W. Masters,et al.  ‘Reinvestment’: A dimension of personality implicated in skill breakdown under pressure , 1993 .

[15]  Robert N. Singer,et al.  To Be Aware or Not Aware? What to Think about while Learning and Performing a Motor Skill , 1993 .

[16]  C J Chamberlin,et al.  Effect of Adding Cognitively Demanding Tasks on Soccer Skill Performance , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  A. G. Priest,et al.  New light on novice—expert differences in physics problem solving , 1992 .

[18]  R. Masters Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure , 1992 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  G. Logan Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[22]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[23]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[24]  M. Peters,et al.  Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  P. Ackerman Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[26]  D. Gill Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 1987 .

[27]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  W. F. Straub,et al.  Cognitive Sport Psychology , 1984 .

[29]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Baumeister Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  M. Peters,et al.  Handedness: Effect of prolonged practice on between hand performance differences , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  Alan Searleman,et al.  Subject Variables and Cerebral Organization for Language , 1980, Cortex.

[34]  J. Requin Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[35]  E. Langer,et al.  When practice makes imperfect: debilitating effects of overlearning. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[37]  G. Stelmach Motor Control: Issues and Trends , 1976 .

[38]  D. Allport,et al.  On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  G. Kimble,et al.  The problem of volition. , 1970, Psychological review.

[40]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and Structure in Sequence Learning , 2004 .

[41]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  G. Caprara,et al.  Personality: Individual Differences , 2000 .

[43]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  R. Proctor,et al.  Skill acquisition and human performance , 1995 .

[45]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[46]  Robert N. Singer,et al.  Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology , 1993 .

[47]  A. Brown Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[48]  F. Weinert,et al.  Metacognition, motivation, and understanding , 1987 .

[49]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[50]  J. Leavitt,et al.  Cognitive demands of skating and stickhandling in ice hockey. , 1979, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[51]  S. Keele,et al.  The Structure of Motor Programs , 1976 .

[52]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[53]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[54]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 1953, Nature.