暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .
[2] Douwe Kiela,et al. Poincaré Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representations , 2017, NIPS.
[3] Rachna,et al. Sapiens: A brief history of humankind , 2017 .
[4] Wilson C. K. Poon,et al. TOPICAL REVIEW: The physics of a model colloid-polymer mixture , 2002 .
[5] Edmund A. Mennis. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .
[6] T. Dupont,et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops , 1997, Nature.
[7] James Surowiecki. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .
[8] Kathleen M. Carley. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure , 1986 .
[9] Damon Centola,et al. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] K. Knorr-Cetina,et al. Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .
[11] Marion Fourcade,et al. The Superiority of Economists , 2015 .
[12] B. Uzzi,et al. Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.
[13] Adam Tauman Kalai,et al. Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings , 2016, NIPS.
[14] Andrei Z. Broder,et al. Anatomy of the long tail: ordinary people with extraordinary tastes , 2010, WSDM '10.
[15] Lu Hong,et al. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] Priscilla S. Markwood,et al. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .
[17] K. K. Cetina. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .
[18] Thomas Vogt,et al. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2012 .
[19] Feng Shi,et al. The wisdom of polarized crowds , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[20] Todd Miner. Book Review: The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few, and how Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2005 .
[21] H. Jaeger,et al. Physics of the Granular State , 1992, Science.
[22] J. Mohr. Introduction: Structures, institutions, and cultural analysis , 2000 .
[23] S. Page. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2007 .
[24] Matthew J. Salganik,et al. Leading the Herd Astray: An Experimental Study of Self-fulfilling Prophecies in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2008, Social psychology quarterly.
[25] Jeffrey Pennington,et al. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.
[26] Luis Garicano,et al. Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.
[27] S. Feld. Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.
[28] R. Breiger,et al. Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture , 2010 .
[29] Steven Skiena,et al. DeepWalk: online learning of social representations , 2014, KDD.
[30] R. Burt. Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.
[31] P. Lazarsfeld,et al. Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .
[32] Kevin Lewis,et al. The Conversion of Cultural Tastes into Social Network Ties1 , 2018, American Journal of Sociology.
[33] Richard A. Harshman,et al. Information Retrieval using a Singular Value Decomposition Model of Latent Semantic Structure , 1988, SIGIR Forum.
[34] Wiebe E. Bijker,et al. Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .
[35] D. Stark,et al. Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity1 , 2015, American Journal of Sociology.
[36] Kathleen M. Carley. A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .
[37] D. Helbing,et al. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] Anita Elberse. Should You Invest in the Long Tail , 2008 .
[39] J. M. Kittross. The measurement of meaning , 1959 .
[40] Amin Vahdat,et al. Hyperbolic Geometry of Complex Networks , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[41] Johanne Saint-Charles,et al. Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations , 2009, Soc. Networks.
[42] Marián Boguñá,et al. Network Cosmology , 2012, Scientific Reports.
[43] D. Kandel. Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.
[44] Jon M. Kleinberg,et al. Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction , 2011, WWW.
[45] H. D. Young,et al. University Physics with Modern Physics Technology Update , 2013 .
[46] J. R. Firth,et al. A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955 , 1957 .
[47] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.
[48] P. Murray. COLLABORATION AND CREATIVITY , 2004 .
[49] W. B. Johnson,et al. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into Hilbert space , 1984 .
[50] H. Simon,et al. ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .
[51] Marvin D. Krohn,et al. The Web of Conformity: A Network Approach to the Explanation of Delinquent Behavior , 1986 .
[52] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[53] John T. Jost,et al. What makes you think you're so popular? Self-evaluation maintenance and the subjective side of the "friendship paradox" , 2001 .
[54] Thomas W. Valente. Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.
[55] A. Barabasi,et al. Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.
[56] John Levi Martin,et al. A formal approach to meaning , 2018 .
[57] Mark S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.
[58] J. Brennecke,et al. Duality beyond Dyads: Multiplex patterning of social ties and cultural meanings , 2017 .
[59] Marc Peter Deisenroth,et al. Neural Embeddings of Graphs in Hyperbolic Space , 2017, ArXiv.
[60] A. van de Rijt,et al. Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.
[61] Steven B. Andrews,et al. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[62] Aparna Joshi,et al. The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .
[63] Matt Taddy,et al. The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class through Word Embeddings , 2018, American Sociological Review.
[64] Arvind Narayanan,et al. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases , 2016, Science.
[65] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: Steps toward a calculus of processing meaning , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[66] Stanley Wasserman,et al. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.
[67] R. Breiger,et al. Culture and Networks , 2015 .
[68] Patricia E. Tweet. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .
[69] K. Boudreau,et al. 'Open' Disclosure of Innovations, Incentives and Follow-on Reuse: Theory on Processes of Cumulative Innovation and a Field Experiment in Computational Biology , 2015 .
[70] Douglas Dunham. The Symmetry of “Circle Limit IV” and Related Patterns , 2009 .
[71] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.
[72] D. Helbing,et al. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[73] Albert,et al. Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.
[74] Roger Guimerà,et al. Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.
[75] S. Wasserman,et al. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .
[76] E. Rogers,et al. Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .
[77] Shuicheng Yan,et al. Graph embedding: a general framework for dimensionality reduction , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).
[78] James A. Evans,et al. Large Teams Have Developed Science and Technology; Small Teams Have Disrupted It , 2017, ArXiv.
[79] P. Stern. Birds of a feather sing together. , 2016, Science.
[80] Camille Roth,et al. Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks , 2010, Soc. Networks.
[81] M. Neale,et al. What Differences Make a Difference? , 2005, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.
[82] D. Meyer,et al. Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .
[83] Dmitri V. Krioukov,et al. Network Mapping by Replaying Hyperbolic Growth , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.
[84] I. Prigogine. Le rendement thermodynamique de la thermodiffusion , 1947 .
[85] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.
[86] Raúl Toral,et al. Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[87] Henry H. Bauer,et al. Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS , 1990 .
[88] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[89] B. L. Whorf. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf , 1956 .
[90] Balazs Vedres,et al. Structural Folds: Generative Disruption in Overlapping Groups1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.
[91] W. Myers,et al. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013 .
[92] Paul DiMaggio. Classification in Art. , 1987 .
[93] Tibor Braun,et al. A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 1980-1999 , 2003, Scientometrics.
[94] Benjamin F. Jones,et al. Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .
[95] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .
[96] M. McPherson,et al. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .
[97] Daniel A. McFarland,et al. Making the Connection: Social Bonding in Courtship Situations1 , 2013, American Journal of Sociology.
[98] L. Fleming,et al. Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .
[99] L. Wittgenstein,et al. Philosophische Untersuchungen = Philosophical investigations , 1953 .
[100] Jure Leskovec,et al. No country for old members: user lifecycle and linguistic change in online communities , 2013, WWW.
[101] Gerald A. Carlino,et al. Urban Density and the Rate of Invention , 2006 .
[102] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .
[103] Marián Boguñá,et al. Popularity versus similarity in growing networks , 2011, Nature.
[104] Monica M. Lee,et al. Doorway to the dharma of duality , 2018, Poetics.
[105] D. Krackhardt,et al. Friendship Patterns and Culture: The Control of Organizational Diversity , 1990 .
[106] Leonard M. Freeman,et al. A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .
[107] Mooweon Rhee,et al. Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .
[108] Ming-Wei Chang,et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.
[109] I. Prigogine,et al. Thermodynamique chimique : conformément aux méthodes de Gibbs et De Donder , 1944 .
[110] Roberto Bonola,et al. Non-Euclidean Geometry; A Critical and Historical Study of Its Development , 1913, The Mathematical Gazette.
[111] Omar Lizardo. Omnivorousness as the bridging of cultural holes: A measurement strategy , 2014, Theory and Society.