The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries

In recent years, renewable energy and environmental efficiency have been interesting issues for both academics and industry actors when discussing sustainable development. Against this background, the present study examines the environmental efficiency of renewable energy from the static and the dynamic perspective in 31 OECD countries, a study conducted to understand the impact of renewable energy across countries. As a non-parametric methodology, data envelopment analysis is used to measure environmental efficiency through multiple inputs and outputs. Labor, capital, and renewable energy supply are the three inputs, while GDP is the desirable output and carbon emissions are the undesirable output. To measure the dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy, the Malmquist productivity index is applied to estimate the average efficiency change from 2004 to 2011. The results demonstrate geographical differences in environmental efficiency across the OECD. Countries in OECD America have the highest average environmental efficiency and those in OECD Europe have the largest standard deviation. We also find that dynamic efficiency is influenced by the global financial crisis triggered in the United States. Further, we show that OECD countries implement both catch-up and frontier shift strategies to improve environmental efficiency.

[1]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants , 2008 .

[2]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation , 2003 .

[3]  Agha Iqbal Ali,et al.  DEA Malmquist productivity measure: New insights with an application to computer industry , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Sue J. Lin,et al.  Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: A non-parametric approach , 2000 .

[6]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment , 2013 .

[7]  A. Owen Environmental Externalities, Market Distortions and the Economics of Renewable Energy Technologies , 2004 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  On the Success of Policy Strategies for the Promotion of Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources in the Eu , 2006 .

[11]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  Analyzing the Greek renewable energy sector: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach , 2012 .

[12]  Jie Wu,et al.  Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review , 2012 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[15]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89 , 1992 .

[16]  Claudiu Cicea,et al.  Environmental efficiency of investments in renewable energy: Comparative analysis at macroeconomic level , 2014 .

[17]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[18]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[19]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China:A non-radial DEA approach , 2013 .

[20]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  Integrating policies for renewables and energy effi ciency: Comparing results from Germany, Luxembourg and Northern Ireland , 2007 .

[21]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[22]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies , 2007 .

[23]  Shunsuke Mori,et al.  Biomass energy used in a sawmill , 2005 .

[24]  Sabuj Kumar Mandal,et al.  Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis , 2010 .

[25]  L. Liang,et al.  Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model , 2014 .

[26]  M. Dimitriu,et al.  EU Funded Projects: from Financial to Economic Analysis , 2011 .

[27]  U. Hansen Restructuring the East German energy system , 1996 .

[28]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: Methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models , 2012 .

[29]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[30]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[31]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Eco-efficiency of the world cement industry: A data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[32]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[33]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: a case study of furniture production. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: a combined use of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2013 .

[36]  Jae Edmonds,et al.  A long-term global energy- economic model of carbon dioxide release from fossil fuel use , 1983 .

[37]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[38]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA environmental assessment in a time horizon: Malmquist index on fuel mix, electricity and CO2 of industrial nations , 2013 .

[39]  Charles C Reith,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of an agricultural research complex. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Environmental Efficiency Measurement with Translog Distance Functions: A Parametric Approach , 2009 .

[41]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  Power Industry Restructuring and Eco-Efficiency Changes: A New Slacks-Based Model in Malmquist- Luenberger Index Measurement , 2014 .

[42]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Environmental Economics and Policy , 2000 .

[43]  Bai-Chen Xie,et al.  Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: Evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries , 2014 .

[44]  Yong-Tae Park,et al.  An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach , 2005 .

[45]  George Halkos,et al.  Measuring the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiency in CO2 emissions: an application of conditional full frontiers , 2014 .

[46]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[47]  Seyed Farid Ghaderi,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity change in power electric generation management companies by us , 2011 .

[48]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[49]  José Luz Silveira,et al.  Ecological efficiency and thermoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration system at a hospital , 2012 .

[50]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain) , 2012 .

[51]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[52]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[53]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .