SVM-based ontology matching approach

There are a lot of heterogeneous ontologies in semantic web, and the task of ontology mapping is to find their semantic relationship. There are integrated methods that only simply combine the similarity values which are used in current multi-strategy ontology mapping. The semantic information is not included in them and a lot of manual intervention is also needed, so it leads to that some factual mapping relations are missed. Addressing this issue, the work presented in this paper puts forward an ontology matching approach, which uses multi-strategy mapping technique to carry on similarity iterative computation and explores both linguistic and structural similarity. Our approach takes different similarities into one whole, as a similarity cube. By cutting operation, similarity vectors are obtained, which form the similarity space, and by this way, mapping discovery can be converted into binary classification. Support vector machine (SVM) has good generalization ability and can obtain best compromise between complexity of model and learning capability when solving small samples and the nonlinear problem. Because of the said reason, we employ SVM in our approach. For making full use of the information of ontology, our implementation and experimental results used a common dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness of the mapping approach. It ensures the recall ration while improving the quality of mapping results.

[1]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[2]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Dimension Reduction in Text Classification with Support Vector Machines , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Federico Girosi,et al.  Training support vector machines: an application to face detection , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web , 2002, WWW '02.

[5]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[6]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Merging Sets of Taxonomically Organized Data Using Concept Mappings under Uncertainty , 2009, OTM Conferences.

[8]  David Madigan,et al.  Large-Scale Bayesian Logistic Regression for Text Categorization , 2007, Technometrics.

[9]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Correspondence Repair Algorithm based on Word Sense Disambiguation and Upper Ontologies , 2009, KEOD.

[11]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: a machine-learning approach , 2001, SIGMOD '01.

[12]  V. R. Benjamins,et al.  Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[13]  Enrico Motta,et al.  DSSim - Managing Uncertainty on the Semantic Web , 2007, OM.

[14]  Patrick Pantel,et al.  Discovering word senses from text , 2002, KDD.

[15]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches , 2002, VLDB.

[16]  Shensheng Zhang,et al.  Effective Large Scale Ontology Mapping , 2006, KSEM.

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Comparison of View-Based Object Recognition Algorithms Using Realistic 3D Models , 1996, ICANN.

[18]  Fabien L. Gandon,et al.  On Ontology Matching Problems - for Building a Corporate Semantic Web in a Multi-Communities Organization , 2004, ICEIS.

[19]  Mehran Sahami,et al.  Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications , 2009 .

[20]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[21]  Min Wang,et al.  SVM-based identification and un-calibrated visual servoing for micro-manipulation , 2010, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[22]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Matching Ontologies in Open Networked Systems: Techniques and Applications , 2006, J. Data Semant..

[23]  Charles Elkan,et al.  The Field Matching Problem: Algorithms and Applications , 1996, KDD.

[24]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[25]  S. Appavu alias Balamurugan,et al.  Improving decision tree performance by exception handling , 2010, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[26]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[27]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[28]  Anastasios Kementsietsidis,et al.  Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data , 2001, SIGMOD 2011.

[29]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Specification of a Common Framework for Characterizing Alignment , 2004 .