Routine turning maneuvers of koi carp Cyprinus carpio koi: effects of turning rate on kinematics and hydrodynamics

SUMMARY Spontaneous swimming behaviors of koi carp Cyprinus carpio koi were recorded using a video tracking system. Routine single-beat turns were selected from the recorded image sequences for kinematic and hydrodynamic analysis. As with C-starts, the turns can be divided into two stages (stage 1 and stage 2), based on kinematics. Stage 1 involves a bend to one side forming a C-shaped curve in the body, while stage 2 corresponds to the return flip of the body and tail. The turning angle in stage 1 accounts for the greatest portion of the total turning angle and the mean turning rate in stage 1 reflects the intensity of turn. The effects of the turning rate in stage 1 on both kinematics and hydrodynamics were examined. The duration of stage 1 remained relatively stable over a nearly tenfold change in turning rate. Consequently, the turning angle is dominated by the turning rate in stage 1. The turning radius is not related to the swimming speed. Moreover, except in very fast turns, the turning radius is also not affected by the turning rate. The angle between the side jet and the carp's initial orientation of a turn does not change substantially with the turning rate, and it is always close to 90° (94.2±3.1°, N=41), so the orientation of the side jet in the forthcoming turn can be predicted. The angle between the jet and the line joining the center of mass of the carp and the trailing edge of the tail (mean value in stage 1) is also always close to 90° (95.3±1.3°, N=41). It is helpful for the carp to maximize the torque so as to improve the turning efficiency. In stage 1, the impulsive moment obtained from the beat of the body and tail and the mean angular momentum of the carp show an agreement in magnitude. Two types of flow patterns in the wake of routine single-beat turns are revealed. The difference between the two types of wakes is in whether or not a vortex ring and a thrust jet are generated in stage 2. The recoil speed of the tail, the bending amplitude of the turn, and the angle of attack of the tail are three probable factors influencing the flow patterns in stage 2.

[1]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Acceleration Performance of Rainbow Trout Salmo Gairdneri and Green Sunfish Lepomis Cyanellus , 1975 .

[2]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Composition and Mechanics of Routine Swimming of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss , 1991 .

[3]  G. Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamics of eel swimming , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Alan Caruba,et al.  THE SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS. , 1978 .

[5]  Eric D Tytell,et al.  The hydrodynamics of eel swimming II. Effect of swimming speed , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  John O. Dabiri,et al.  On the estimation of swimming and flying forces from wake measurements , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  E. G. Drucker,et al.  Wake dynamics and fluid forces of turning maneuvers in sunfish. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Triantafyllou,et al.  Near-body flow dynamics in swimming fish , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  E. G. Drucker,et al.  A hydrodynamic analysis of fish swimming speed: wake structure and locomotor force in slow and fast labriform swimmers. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Harold E. Saunders,et al.  Hydrodynamics in Ship Design , 1957 .

[11]  Lauder Speed effects on midline kinematics during steady undulatory swimming of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  David F. Rogers,et al.  THE SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS , 1977 .

[13]  J. Brackenbury Escape manoeuvres in damsel-fly larvae: kinematics and dynamics , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  E. Standen,et al.  Escape manoeuvres in the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Function of the Caudal Fin During Locomotion in Fishes: Kinematics, Flow Visualization, and Evolutionary Patterns1 , 2000 .

[16]  Domenici,et al.  The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  Jun Sakakibara,et al.  Stereo-PIV study of flow around a maneuvering fish , 2004 .

[18]  Webb Pw,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976 .

[19]  Lijiang Zeng,et al.  Novel method based on video tracking system for simultaneous measurement of kinematics and flow in the wake of a freely swimming fish , 2006 .

[20]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  SPEED, ACCELERATION AND MANOEUVRABILITY OF TWO TELEOST FISHES , 1983 .

[21]  D. Weihs,et al.  A hydrodynamical analysis of fish turning manoeuvres , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  A. M. Fincham,et al.  Low cost, high resolution DPIV for measurement of turbulent fluid flow , 1997 .

[23]  J. Videler,et al.  How the body contributes to the wake in undulatory fish swimming: flow fields of a swimming eel (Anguilla anguilla). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Performance and maneuverability of three species of teleostean fishes , 2001 .

[25]  George V Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of caudal fin locomotion by chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus (Scombridae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  Spierts,et al.  Kinematics and muscle dynamics of C- and S-starts of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  Lijiang Zeng,et al.  Kinematics, hydrodynamics and energetic advantages of burst-and-coast swimming of koi carps (Cyprinus carpio koi) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  P W Webb,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  C. Gerstner,et al.  Maneuverability of four species of coral-reef fish that differ in body and pectoral-fin morphology , 1999 .

[30]  Robert W. Blake,et al.  The Kinematics and Performance of the Escape Response in the Angelfish (Pterophyllum Eimekei) , 1991 .

[31]  J A Walker,et al.  Does a rigid body limit maneuverability? , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  Caudal Fin and Body Movement in the Propulsion of some Fish , 1963 .

[33]  Lauder,et al.  Heterocercal tail function in leopard sharks: a three-dimensional kinematic analysis of two models , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  J. M. Donley,et al.  Swimming kinematics of juvenile kawakawa tuna (Euthynnus affinis) and chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[35]  D. O'Malley,et al.  Locomotor repertoire of the larval zebrafish: swimming, turning and prey capture. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  Swimming , 2002, Clinics in sports medicine.

[37]  J. Videler,et al.  Fish foot prints: morphology and energetics of the wake behind a continuously swimming mullet (Chelon labrosus Risso). , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.