A reflective stakeholder approach: Co‐orientation as a basis for communication and learning

Organisations are undergoing dramatic changes as stakeholder groups exert an ever‐increasing influence on the place and responsibilities of organisations in society. Important drivers in this process include the environmental movement, the search for total quality management, the concept of sustainable development, ethics and organisational learning. Because the various stakeholders can view these complex issues quite differently from the organisation, it is important that those working with communications are able to understand the underlying complexities of stakeholder relationships. Work in a number of diverse fields has provided an understanding of the factors involved in developing an effective communications strategy. Stakeholder theory is an important contributor in that it provides a means for uncovering the relevant participants in the process. The authors contend that, as part of this process, the co‐orientation model can provide a unifying framework for identifying the nature of the relationships between stakeholders or actors in a communication process. At the heart of this model lies the notion of “mental models” from the organisational learning literature and the recognition that in order for any communication process to be effective these models must be “oriented” properly. The authors build on research from the organisational learning field to gain a deeper understanding of the processes that influence our perceptions of stakeholder groups. Three specific communication skills are identified that enable the communications manager to engage stakeholders in a meaningful dialogue, and thereby enhance the effectiveness of the organisation’s communication efforts. These communication skills are reflection, inquiry and advocacy.

[1]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[3]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[4]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  Managing Corporate Legitimacy: Public Affairs Activities, Strategies and Effectiveness , 1993 .

[5]  Liana Kourteli,et al.  Scanning the business environment: some conceptual issues , 2000 .

[6]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  The Strategy Process , 1988 .

[7]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[8]  B. L. Jones,et al.  Managing public policy issues , 1979 .

[9]  Philip H. Mirvis Historical foundations of organization learning , 1996 .

[10]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[11]  T. Newcomb An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[12]  T. Jones INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[13]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image , 1996 .

[14]  Martin B. Meznar,et al.  Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms , 1995 .

[15]  P. Senge The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization , 2014 .

[16]  William N. Isaacs Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning , 1993 .

[17]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Interpersonal Approaches to Communication Research , 1973 .

[18]  John D. Stoffels,et al.  Strategic issues management : a comprehensive guide to environmental scanning , 1994 .

[19]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[20]  D. Hambrick Environmental scanning and organizational strategy , 1982 .

[21]  R. Mason,et al.  Creating A Dialectical Social Science , 1981 .

[22]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[23]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[24]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[25]  W. Scott Stakeholders of the organizational mind , 1983 .

[26]  A. Smithies Economics and public policy , 1955 .

[27]  Robert Eyestone From Social Issues to Public Policy , 1978 .

[28]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[29]  J. Harrison,et al.  Managing and partnering with external stakeholders , 1996 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[31]  F. Hansford-Miller 13. Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision , 1988 .

[32]  R. Daft,et al.  The information environments of organizations , 1987 .

[33]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[34]  J. Grunig,et al.  Managing public relations , 1984 .

[35]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[36]  R. Hogarth Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[37]  J. Post,et al.  The public affairs function in American corporations: Development and relations with corporate planning , 1982 .

[38]  Jay Black,et al.  Ethics and Professional Persuasive Communications. , 1994 .

[39]  David Lei,et al.  Management practices in learning organizations , 1992 .