Shaping the Signal Response during the Approach to Steady State in Three‐Dimensional Magnetization‐Prepared Rapid Gradient‐Echo Imaging Using Variable Flip Angles

A theoretical algorithm for shaping the signal response during the approach to steady state in three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo (3D MP‐RAGE) pulse sequences has been developed and implemented. This algorithm derives the flip angle series required to produce specifically chosen time evolutions of the signal intensities during the data acquisition segment of 3D MP‐RAGE sequences. Theoretical predictions for the cases of unshaped, uniform, and mono‐exponential decay signal responses were quantitatively validated with a doped‐water phantom on a 1.5‐T whole‐body imager and in all cases there was excellent agreement between the theoretical and experimental values. The effects of RF inhomogeneities and eddy currents on the signal response shaping were also investigated. To demonstrate the potential utility of the technique, the signal response shaping algorithm was applied to a Tl‐weighted 3D MP‐RAGE sequence to derive the acquisition flip angle series which theoretically yields the maximum white matter/gray matter signal difference (WGSD) consistent with the chosen response shape. Images obtained from a healthy volunteer using this variable flip angle sequence were compared with 3D RF‐spoiled steady‐state gradient‐echo images obtained in the same total imaging time. The 3D MP‐RAGE images demonstrated a 41% increase in the WGSD‐to‐noise ratio. These initial very promising results indicate that with further refinement to eliminate some intensity artifacts, the variable flip angle 3D MP‐RAGE technique may, with respect to certain image properties, provide considerable improvements over currently available 3D gradient‐echo imaging techniques.© 1992 Academic Press,Inc.

[1]  A. Haase,et al.  Rapid NMR Imaging Using Low Flip-Angle Pulses , 2004 .

[2]  T A Spraggins,et al.  T2‐weighted three‐dimensional MP‐RAGE MR imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  M. L. Wood,et al.  Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R L Ehman,et al.  T1-weighted snapshot gradient-echo MR imaging of the abdomen. , 1991, Radiology.

[5]  J. Mugler,et al.  Rapid three‐dimensional T1‐weighted MR imaging with the MP‐RAGE sequence , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  M. Drobnitzky,et al.  Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: diagnosis by ultrafast Gd-DTPA enhanced FLASH MR. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  V M Runge,et al.  Clinical comparison of three‐dimensional MP‐RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Wednesday morning grand ballroom AB papers 309–316. MRA: CNS applications , 1991 .

[9]  V. Runge,et al.  Monday morning Cloumbus hall K papers 141–148. Contrast agents: Experimental , 1991 .

[10]  D G Nishimura,et al.  Multiple‐readout selective inversion recovery angiography , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Z H Cho,et al.  Analysis of eddy currents in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  D Chien,et al.  Strategies to improve contrast in turboFLASH imaging: Reordered phase encoding and K‐space segmentation , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  E E de Lange,et al.  Magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) MR imaging of the liver: comparison with spin-echo imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  The importance of phase‐encoding order in ultra‐short TR snapshot MR imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  E M Haacke,et al.  Fast MR imaging: techniques and clinical applications. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R R Edelman,et al.  Segmented turboFLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast. , 1990, Radiology.

[17]  D. Norris,et al.  A simple method of generating variable T1 contrast images using temporally reordered phase encoding , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  A. Haase,et al.  Snapshot flash mri. applications to t1, t2, and chemical‐shift imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. Jones,et al.  Approach to equilibrium in snapshot imaging. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  T. Parrish,et al.  3-D FLASH imaging using a single surface coil and a new adiabatic pulse, BIR-4. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[22]  L R Schad,et al.  Fast and precise T1 imaging using a TOMROP sequence. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  D Matthaei,et al.  Inversion recovery snapshot FLASH MR imaging. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  M. L. Wood,et al.  Artifacts due to residual magnetization in three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Medical physics.

[25]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Elimination of transverse coherences in FLASH MRI , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  M. Gyngell,et al.  The application of steady-state free precession in rapid 2DFT NMR imaging: FAST and CE-FAST sequences. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[28]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Multiple field strength in vivo T1 and T2 for cerebrospinal fluid protons , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Three second clinical NMR images using a gradient recalled acquisition in a study state mode (GRASS) , 1986 .