Robot-Aided Gait Training with LOPES

Robot-aided gait training in stroke survivors and spinal cord injury patients has shown inconclusive effects on walking ability. It is widely acknowledged that the control and design of the robotic devices needs to be further optimized to be able to provide training that fits better into modern insights in neural plasticity, motor learning, and motor recovery and in doing so improves its effectiveness. We will go more deeply into the need and scientific background for improvements on active participation, task specificity, and the facilitation of different recovery mechanisms. Subsequently, we will discuss recent advances that have been made in the control and design of robotic devices to improve on these aspects. Hereby, we will focus on the robotic gait training device LOPES that has been developed within our group. We will discuss how its design and control approach should contribute to improvements on all of the aforementioned aspects. The feasibility of the chosen approach is demonstrated by experimental results in healthy subjects and chronic stroke survivors. Future clinical testing has to demonstrate whether the outcome of robot-aided gait training can indeed be improved by increasing its task specificity, by the active contribution of the patient, and by allowing different movement strategies.

[1]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[2]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An alternative approach to synthesizing bipedal walking , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Jan F. Veneman,et al.  The Effects on Kinematics and Muscle Activity of Walking in a Robotic Gait Trainer During Zero-Force Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  M.P.M. van Nunen Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device , 2013 .

[7]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  R. Teasell,et al.  The Role of Task-Specific Training in Rehabilitation Therapies , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[9]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  A Series Elastic- and Bowden-Cable-Based Actuation System for Use as Torque Actuator in Exoskeleton-Type Robots , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  B. Conway,et al.  The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Recovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes? , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  R. Müller,et al.  Modulation of leg muscle activity and gait kinematics by walking speed and bodyweight unloading. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[15]  K. Kubota,et al.  Longitudinal Optical Imaging Study for Locomotor Recovery After Stroke , 2003, Stroke.

[16]  R. Ekkelenkamp,et al.  Selective control of a subtask of walking in a robotic gait trainer(LOPES) , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[17]  Martin Buss,et al.  Passive and accurate torque control of series elastic actuators , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: a simulation study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  R. Riener,et al.  A Novel Mechatronic Body Weight Support System , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  K. Roach,et al.  Influence of a Locomotor Training Approach on Walking Speed and Distance in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[21]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Frans C T van der Helm,et al.  Fixating the pelvis in the horizontal plane affects gait characteristics. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[23]  Bram Koopman,et al.  Body weight support by virtual model control of an impedance controlled exoskeleton (LOPES) for gait training. , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  The influence of merged muscle excitation modules on post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  K. Kubota,et al.  Cortical Mapping of Gait in Humans: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Topography Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[27]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  J. Eng,et al.  Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[30]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  H. V. D. Crommert,et al.  Neural control of locomotion: sensory control of the central pattern generator and its relation to treadmill training. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[32]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: Adaptations to altered mechanical demands. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  A. Luft,et al.  Treadmill Exercise Activates Subcortical Neural Networks and Improves Walking After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Stroke.

[34]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  An ankle-foot orthosis powered by artificial pneumatic muscles. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[35]  S. Hesse,et al.  A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[36]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Should Body Weight–Supported Treadmill Training and Robotic-Assistive Steppers for Locomotor Training Trot Back to the Starting Gate? , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[38]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[39]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Brain Activity Changes Associated With Treadmill Training After Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[40]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  The added value of an actuated ankle-foot orthosis to restore normal gait function in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[41]  Chitralakshmi K. Balasubramanian,et al.  Anterior-Posterior Ground Reaction Forces as a Measure of Paretic Leg Contribution in Hemiparetic Walking , 2006, Stroke.

[42]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power Assist System HAL-3 for Gait Disorder Person , 2002, ICCHP.

[43]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  The effect of directional inertias added to pelvis and ankle on gait , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[44]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[45]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton , 2006 .

[46]  Jaap H. Buurke,et al.  Selective and adaptive robotic support of foot clearance for training stroke survivors with stiff knee gait , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[47]  A. Hof The 'extrapolated center of mass' concept suggests a simple control of balance in walking. , 2008, Human movement science.

[48]  R. Meeusen,et al.  Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[49]  A. Kuo,et al.  Active control of lateral balance in human walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting Improvement in Gait After Stroke: A Longitudinal Prospective Study , 2005, Stroke.

[53]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[54]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Effects of unilateral robotic limb loading on gait characteristics in subjects with chronic stroke , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[55]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Davide Cattaneo,et al.  Task-Oriented Biofeedback to Improve Gait in Individuals With Chronic Stroke: Motor Learning Approach , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[57]  Bram Koopman,et al.  Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[58]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[59]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[60]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[61]  A. Joseph Threlkeld,et al.  Temporospatial and kinematic gait alterations during treadmill walking with body weight suspension. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[62]  S Hesse,et al.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[63]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking , 2011, NeuroImage.

[64]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Feasibility of Manual Teach-and-Replay and Continuous Impedance Shaping for Robotic Locomotor Training Following Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.