Factors influencing women's preference to select a combined hormonal contraceptive method: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Effectiveness and side effects are the main concerns when selecting a contraceptive method. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the preference of a combined hormonal contraception method by Lithuanian women, the reasons for selecting one of them and rejecting other two methods, and the factors determining selection or rejection. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional multicenter survey was performed by the Lithuanian Society of Private Obstetricians and Gynecologists. A total of 4134 women, aged 18-49, who visited their physician due to initiation or reinitiation of hormonal contraception completed self-administered questionnaires identifying the reasons to select one method and reject the two remaining ones. Descriptive and inferential statistics methods were used for data analysis. RESULTS The vaginal ring was the most accepted contraception method (55.4%), followed by the pill (35.6%). The skin patch was least preferable (9%). The vaginal ring and the skin patch were mainly selected for the frequency of use (72.9% and 51.2%, respectively), convenience (48.5% and 71%, respectively), and lower probability of noncompliance (48.7% and 63.5%, respectively). The main reason for selecting the pill was familiarity with the method (50.7%). The acceptance of vaginal ring increased with age and was higher among women with higher education. CONCLUSIONS The most important factors when selecting a contraceptive method among the methods with equal effectiveness and similar safety profile were convenience, frequency of use, and lower probability of noncompliance. Age, education, and employment status were found to be other reasons associated with the choice of contraceptive method.

[1]  L. Vicente,et al.  Knowledge-attitude-practice survey among Portuguese gynaecologists regarding combined hormonal contraceptives methods , 2012, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[2]  C. Bellone,et al.  Availability of contraceptive choice , 2010 .

[3]  S. Skouby,et al.  Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries , 2004, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[4]  J. Peipert,et al.  Contraceptive choice: how do oral contraceptive users differ from condom users and women who use no contraception? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  D. Cibula,et al.  Women's contraceptive practices and sexual behaviour in Europe , 2008, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[6]  Tschudin Sibil,et al.  Contraceptive counseling by gynecologists – which issues are discussed and does gender play a role( , 2007 .

[7]  Virginija Vanagienė,et al.  Kontracepcijos vartojimo Lietuvoje ypatybės. Kas pasikeitė per 10 metų , 2007 .

[8]  S. Riggs,et al.  Adolescents' experience with the combined estrogen and progestin transdermal contraceptive method Ortho Evra. , 2005, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[9]  F. Al-Yaman,et al.  Population division department of economic and social affairs United Nations MORTPAK for windows version 4.0. , 2004 .

[10]  A. Fisher,et al.  The impact of improved compliance with a weekly contraceptive transdermal system (Ortho Evra) on contraceptive efficacy. , 2004, Contraception.

[11]  M. Zieman,et al.  New contraceptive options. , 2004, American family physician.

[12]  J. Kerin New contraceptive choices across reproductive life , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[13]  H. Leridon,et al.  Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[14]  M. Gardner,et al.  Service factors affecting access and choice of contraceptive services in Myanmar. , 2002 .

[15]  S. Ahmed,et al.  New contraceptive methods. , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[16]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Access quality of care and medical barriers in family planning programs. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Bruce Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. , 1990, Studies in family planning.

[18]  W. E. Skiens,et al.  Low-level, progestogen-releasing vaginal contraceptive devices. , 1979, Contraception.