Workshop report Photopatch testing - methods and indications

Summary This workshop report aims to provide a concise and up to date summary of the clinical use and methodology of photopatch testing. Specific recommendations are made concerning a standard series of six potential photoallergens. Photoallergic dermatitis reactions are considered to be a form of cell-mediated hypersensitivity in which a photoactivated chemical or a photoproduct acts as a hapten or a complete antigen. Ultraviolet exposure is required both for induction and elicitation of the immune response. In contrast, phototoxic (or ‘photoirritant’) reactions are not considered to be immunologically mediated, and will occur in all subjects given sufficient exposure to the photosensitizer and ultraviolet radiation. The acute reactions to porphyrins and psoralens are examples of phototoxicity. Some compounds, for example chlorpromazine, can induce both phototoxic and photoallergic reactions. A further complication is that many photoallergens can, in some subjects, also induce allergic contact reactions without ultraviolet activation. Photopatch testing is used to diagnose and investigate photoallergic contact dermatitis. Other than confirming that a substance has photosensitizing potential, photopatch testing is not useful for suspected phototoxic skin reactions. There are widespread differences in the practice of photopatch testing, both within the U.K. and in other countries. This is a report of a British Photodermatology Group workshop on photopatch testing, held in Newcastle upon Tyne in November 1995. The main purpose of the workshop was to discuss the indications, technique and interpretation of results of photopatch testing, in order to provide a list of photoallergens of current clinical relevance and to give guidance on technique.

[1]  N. Soter,et al.  Results of evaluation of 203 patients for photosensitivity in a 7.3-year period. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[2]  K. Kimura,et al.  Photoallergic contact dermatitis from the sunscreen ethylhexyl‐p‐methoxycinnamate (Parsol® MCX) , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  P. Norris,et al.  Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  A. Moreau,et al.  Photocontact allergy to oxybenzone: ten years of experience. , 1994, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[5]  G. Murphy,et al.  Determination of threshold UV‐A elicitation dose in photopatch testing , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  S. Dalac,et al.  Photoallergy to hexamidine. , 1993, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[7]  G. Murphy,et al.  Contact and photocontact allergy to dibenzoylmethanes and contact allergy to methylbenzylidene camphor , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  V. Deleo,et al.  Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Results of photopatch testing in New York, 1985 to 1990. , 1992, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  R. Kalb Persistent light reaction to hexachlorophene. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[10]  P. Norris,et al.  Photoallergic contact dermatitis from oxybenzone aggravating polymorphic light eruption , 1991, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  J. Hawk,et al.  Chronic actinic dermatitis and sunscreen allergy , 1991, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[12]  R. Motley,et al.  Photocontact dermatitis due to isopropyl and butyl methoxy dibenzoylmethanes (Eusolex 8020 and Parsol 1789) , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  P. Thune,et al.  The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study 1980-1985: final report. , 1988, Photo-dermatology.

[14]  B. Diffey,et al.  THE ACTION SPECTRUM IN DRUG INDUCED PHOTOSENSITIVITY , 1988, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[15]  J. English,et al.  Sensitivity to sunscreens , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  J. W. Weyland,et al.  Contact allergy to 4‐isopropyl dibenzoylmethane and 3‐(4′‐methylbenzylidene) camphor in the sunscreen Eusolex 8021 , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  W. Frain-Bell,et al.  A study of compositae plant extract reactions in photosensitivity dermatitis. , 1985, Photo-dermatology.

[18]  C. Ramsay Transient and persistent photosensitivity due to musk ambrette. Clinical and photobiological studies , 1984, The British journal of dermatology.

[19]  P. Thune Contact and photocontact allergy to sunscreens. , 1984, Photo-dermatology.

[20]  J. Hawk,et al.  Acute photosensitivity from the sunscreen 2‐ethoxyethyl‐p‐methoxycinnamate , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  R. Armstrong,et al.  PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS TO MUSK AMBRETTE: ACTION SPECTRA IN GUINEA PIGS AND MAN * , 1981, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[22]  K. Kaidbey,et al.  Photocontact allergy to benzocaine. , 1981, Archives of dermatology.

[23]  W. Frain-Bell,et al.  Contact allergic sensitivity to chrysanthemum and the photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid syndrome , 1979, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  C. Ramsay Skin responses to ultraviolet radiation in contact photodermatitis due to fentichlor. , 1979, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  G. Raugi,et al.  Photosensitivity from men's colognes. , 1979, Archives of dermatology.

[26]  R. Rietsch Photocontact dermatitis to hydrocortisone , 1978 .

[27]  I. Caro Contact allergy/photo allergy to glyceryl PABA and benzocaine , 1978, Contact dermatitis.

[28]  A. Kligman,et al.  Photocontact allergy to 6‐methylcoumarin , 1978, Contact dermatitis.

[29]  J. C. Leun,et al.  Photosensitivity owing to thiourea. , 1977 .

[30]  T. Horio Allergic and photoallergic dermatitis from diphenhydramine. , 1976, Archives of dermatology.

[31]  Daljit Singh Nagreh Photodermatitis – study of the condition in Kuantan, Malaysia , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[32]  J. Willock,et al.  The syndrome of chronic photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid , 1974, The British journal of dermatology.

[33]  J. Wahlberg,et al.  Hypersensitivity and photosensitivity to chlorhexidine. , 1971, Dermatologica.

[34]  J. Burry,et al.  PHOTOCONTACT DERMATITIS FROM JADIT , 1970, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  T. Enta,et al.  ABSORPTION AND ACTION SPECTRA STUDIES ON BITHIONOL AND HALOGENATED SALICYLANILIDE PHOTOSENSITIVITY * , 1970, The British journal of dermatology.

[36]  J. Knox,et al.  Salicylanilide photosensitivity. Reaction to ultraviolet under conditions of normal soap usage. , 1970, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[37]  J. C. Starke Photoallergy to sandalwood oil. , 1967, Archives of dermatology.

[38]  S. O'Quinn,et al.  Contact photodermatitis due to bithionol and related compounds. , 1967, JAMA.

[39]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  PHOTODERMATITIS DUE TO TETRACHLORSALICYLANILIDE. , 1961, The British journal of dermatology.