Middle School Students’ Motivation and Quality of Experience: A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional School Environments

This study compared the motivation and quality of experience of demographically matched students from Montessori and traditional middle school programs. Approximately 290 students responded to the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) and filled out questionnaires. Multivariate analyses showed that the Montessori students reported greater affect, potency (i.e., feeling energetic), intrinsic motivation, flow experience, and undivided interest (i.e., the combination of high intrinsic motivation and high salience or importance) while engaged in academic activities at school. The traditional middle school students reported higher salience while doing academic work; however, such responses were often accompanied by low intrinsic motivation. When engaged in informal, nonacademic activities, the students in both school contexts reported similar experiences. These results are discussed in terms of current thought on motivation in education and middle school reform.

[1]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[2]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[3]  Maria Montessori,et al.  The Secret of Childhood , 1945 .

[4]  E. M. Standing,et al.  Maria Montessori: Her Life and Work , 1959 .

[5]  P. Witty The Role of Interest , 1961, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Maria Montessori,et al.  Spontaneous Activity In Education , 1965 .

[7]  I. Fras Identity: Youth and Crisis , 1968 .

[8]  B. Mathis 12 – MOTIVATION AND SCHOOLING , 1970 .

[9]  Maria Montessori,et al.  From Childhood to Adolescence , 1973 .

[10]  J. Dewey,et al.  Interest and Effort in Education , 1975 .

[11]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[12]  A. E. Gottfried,et al.  Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Elementary and Junior High School Students. , 1985 .

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  Dale A. Blyth,et al.  Moving into adolescence , 1987 .

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[16]  C. Midgley,et al.  Student, Teacher, and Observer Perceptions of the Classroom Environment Before and after the Transition to Junior High School , 1988 .

[17]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[18]  K. Miller,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[19]  National Goals: Four Priorities for Educational Researchers. , 1990 .

[20]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Curriculum and Instruction in Middle-Grade Schools. , 1990 .

[21]  S. Sarason The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform , 1990 .

[22]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship. , 1990 .

[23]  C. Midgley,et al.  Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. , 1991 .

[24]  Carol Midgley,et al.  Enhancing Student Motivation: A Schoolwide Approach , 1991 .

[25]  Reed W. Larson,et al.  Boredom in the Middle School Years: Blaming Schools versus Blaming Students , 1991, American Journal of Education.

[26]  Sarah Lord,et al.  What Are We Doing to Early Adolescents? The Impact of Educational Contexts on Early Adolescents , 1991, American Journal of Education.

[27]  Tim Urdan,et al.  School Leader as Motivator , 1992 .

[28]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[29]  Patricia Kowalski,et al.  Individual Differences in the Effects of Educational Transitions on Young Adolescent’s Perceptions of Competence and Motivational Orientation , 1992 .

[30]  Steven J. Ingels,et al.  National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. First Follow-Up: School Component Data File User's Manual. , 1992 .

[31]  C. Midgley,et al.  Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[32]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure , 1993 .

[33]  Valerie E. Lee,et al.  Effects of School Restructuring on the Achievement and Engagement of Middle-Grade Students. , 1993 .

[34]  C. Goodenow Classroom Belonging among Early Adolescent Students , 1993 .

[35]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Motivation and Schooling in the Middle Grades , 1994 .

[36]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[37]  Kevin Rathunde Family Context and Talented Adolescents' Optimal Experience in School-Related Activities. , 1996 .

[38]  M I Cohen,et al.  "Great transitions, preparing adolescents for a new century". A commentary on the health component of the concluding report of the Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. , 1996, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[39]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Social motivation: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[40]  Robert D. Felner,et al.  The Impact of School Reform for the Middle Years. , 1997 .

[41]  Robert D. Felner,et al.  Preparing adolescents for the twenty-first century: The impact of school reform for the middle grades: A longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points –based comprehensive school transformation , 1997 .

[42]  TALENTED TEENAGERS: THE ROOTS OF SUCCESS & FAILURE (Authors: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Kevin Rathunde, & Samuel Whalen) , 1997 .

[43]  Joan Lipsitz,et al.  What Works in Middle-Grades School Reform. , 1997 .

[44]  A. E. Gottfried,et al.  Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children's academic intrinsic motivation: a longitudinal study. , 1998, Child development.

[45]  K. Wentzel Social Relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers , 1998 .

[46]  W. Hagborg,et al.  An investigation of a brief measure of school membership. , 1998, Adolescence.

[47]  G. Lakoff Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[48]  Mark Rowlands,et al.  The body in mind , 1999 .

[49]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Declining Motivation After the Transition to Middle School: Schools Can Make a Difference. , 1999 .

[50]  Cathleen A. Towey Flow , 2000, My Wilderness.

[51]  H. M. Marks,et al.  Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years , 2000 .

[52]  R. Larson Toward a psychology of positive youth development. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[53]  Doing Comparative Education Research: Issues and Problems , 2001 .

[54]  Doing Comparative Education Research: Issues and Problems , 2001 .

[55]  Gregory J. Marchant,et al.  Relations of middle school students' perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. , 2001 .

[56]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Classroom Social Environment and Changes in Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement During Middle School , 2001 .

[57]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Why Schools Should Teach for Wisdom: The Balance Theory of Wisdom in Educational Settings , 2001 .

[58]  K. Rathunde,et al.  Montessori Education and Optimal Experience: A Framework for New Research. , 2001 .

[59]  Marcia Gentry,et al.  Students ’ Perceptions of Classroom Activities : Are There Grade-Level and Gender Differences ? , 2002 .

[60]  Kathryn R Wentzel,et al.  Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. , 2002, Child development.

[61]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  The Social Context of Middle School: Teachers, Friends, and Activities in Montessori and Traditional School Environments , 2005, The Elementary School Journal.

[62]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Child and Adolescent Development for Educators , 2006 .

[63]  W. N. Schoenfeld,et al.  Principles of Psychology , 2007 .