Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative

Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested, hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. ReScience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests.

[1]  Lorena A. Barba,et al.  Reproducible and Replicable Computational Fluid Dynamics: It’s Harder Than You Think , 2017, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[2]  Jeffrey Perkel,et al.  Democratic databases: science on GitHub , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Anton Nekrutenko,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[5]  Nicole Janz,et al.  Bringing the Gold Standard into the Classroom: Replication in University Teaching , 2015 .

[6]  Christian S. Collberg,et al.  Repeatability in computer systems research , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[7]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005 .

[8]  Nicolas P. Rougier,et al.  [Re] Interaction between cognitive and motor cortico-basal ganglia loops during decision making: a computational study , 2015 .

[9]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  CDE: Using System Call Interposition to Automatically Create Portable Software Packages , 2011, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[10]  Christian Collberg,et al.  Measuring Reproducibility in Computer Systems Research , 2014 .

[11]  Ludovic Courtès,et al.  Reproducible and User-Controlled Software Environments in HPC with Guix , 2015, Euro-Par Workshops.

[12]  Joseph Stachelek,et al.  [Re] Least-cost modelling on irregular landscape graphs , 2016 .

[13]  François-Xavier Coudert,et al.  Reproducible Research in Computational Chemistry of Materials , 2017 .

[14]  Lorena A. Barba,et al.  Reproducible and replicable CFD: it's harder than you think , 2016 .

[15]  Daniel S. Katz,et al.  Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): design and first-year review , 2017, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[16]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[17]  Charles Anderson,et al.  Docker , 2015, IEEE Softw..

[18]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Best Practices for Scientific Computing , 2012, PLoS biology.

[19]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  Four aspects to make science open “by design” and not as an after-thought , 2015, GigaScience.

[20]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[21]  Greg Wilson,et al.  Software Carpentry: lessons learned , 2014, F1000Research.

[22]  Mehdi Khamassi,et al.  [Re] Speed/accuracy trade-off between the habitual and the goal-directed process , 2016 .

[23]  MalekiArian,et al.  Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Konrad Hinsen Writing Software Specifications , 2015, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[25]  Arian Maleki,et al.  Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2009, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[26]  Andrew P. Davison Automated Capture of Experiment Context for Easier Reproducibility in Computational Research , 2012, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[27]  J. Bower 20 Years of Computational Neuroscience , 2013, Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[29]  Tiina Manninen,et al.  Reproducibility and Comparability of Computational Models for Astrocyte Calcium Excitability , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[30]  Frank Yellin,et al.  The Java Virtual Machine Specification , 1996 .

[31]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature , 2016, PLoS biology.

[32]  Juliana Freire,et al.  noWorkflow: Capturing and Analyzing Provenance of Scripts , 2014, IPAW.

[33]  Alex M. Warren Repeatability and Benefaction in Computer Systems Research — A Study and a Modest Proposal , 2015 .

[34]  Nicolas P. Rougier,et al.  A long journey into reproducible computational neuroscience , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..