Antecedents and outcomes of work-related flow: A meta-analysis

[1]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job Demands–Resources Theory: Ten Years Later , 2022, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.

[2]  C. Peifer,et al.  The Relationship between Flow Experience and Burnout Symptoms: A Systematic Review , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  A. Bakker.  The social psychology of work engagement: state of the field , 2022, Career Development International.

[4]  Picta,et al.  Tabula , 2022, Höfische Texte.

[5]  A. Y. Ou,et al.  Experienced incivility in the workplace: A meta-analytical review of its construct validity and nomological network. , 2021, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Thomas P. DePatie,et al.  Nudging flow through ‘SMART’ goal setting to decrease stress, increase engagement, and increase performance at work , 2021 .

[7]  Burcu Aydin Kucuk.  Work Flow Experience in the Light of Leader-Member Exchange and Person-Job Fit Theories , 2020, Psychological reports.

[8]  T. Taris,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: Challenge and Hindrance Appraisals of Work Characteristics and Their Implications for Employee’s Well-Being , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[9]  A. Bakker,et al.  Go with the flow: A neuroscientific view on being fully engaged , 2020, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Matt C. Howard,et al.  The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. , 2020, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Bertolt Meyer,et al.  Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and flow at work , 2020 .

[12]  Christopher J. Hartwell,et al.  Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations , 2020 .

[13]  C. Rudolph,et al.  Meta-analysis in vocational behavior: A systematic review and recommendations for best practices , 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior.

[14]  Ned Wellman,et al.  Taking engagement to task: The nature and functioning of task engagement across transitions. , 2020, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Carlo Gabriel Porto Bellini,et al.  The measurement of flow and social flow at work: a 30-year systematic review of the literature , 2019 .

[16]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls,et al.  Coping with Work Stressors and Paving the Way for Flow: Challenge and Hindrance Demands, Humor, and Cynicism , 2019, Journal of Happiness Studies.

[17]  Silvia Helena Koller,et al.  Work-Related Flow Inventory: Evidence of Validity of the Brazilian Version , 2019, Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto).

[18]  S. Parker,et al.  When Is Proactivity Wise? A Review of Factors That Influence the Individual Outcomes of Proactive Behavior , 2019, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior.

[19]  R. Kessler,et al.  Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[20]  C. Hutz,et al.  Flow and Engagement at Work: A Literature Review , 2018, Psico-USF.

[21]  A. Bakker,et al.  Daily strengths use and employee well‐being: The moderating role of personality , 2018, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

[22]  A. Bakker,et al.  Motivating Job Characteristics and Happiness at Work: A Multilevel Perspective , 2018, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Spillover–Crossover Model , 2018, Current Issues in Work and Organizational Psychology.

[24]  A. Bakker,et al.  Proactive vitality management in the work context: development and validation of a new instrument , 2018, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  L. C. Trevelin,et al.  Flow experience and the mobilization of attentional resources , 2018, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Hamlin,et al.  Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior. , 2018, Current opinion in psychology.

[27]  A. Bakker,et al.  Flow at Work: a Self-Determination Perspective , 2017 .

[28]  K. K. Mihelič,et al.  “Dear Employer, Let Me Introduce Myself” – Flow, Satisfaction with Work–Life Balance and Millennials’ Creativity , 2017 .

[29]  A. Avsec,et al.  Bringing the Psychology of Situations into Flow Research: Personality and Situation Characteristics as Predictors of Flow , 2017 .

[30]  Frank A. Bosco,et al.  MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta-analysis , 2017 .

[31]  Sara Tement,et al.  Flow among higher education teachers: A job demands-resources perspective , 2016 .

[32]  Carlton J. Fong,et al.  The challenge–skill balance and antecedents of flow: A meta-analytic investigation , 2015 .

[33]  Scott Tonidandel,et al.  RWA Web: A Free, Comprehensive, Web-Based, and User-Friendly Tool for Relative Weight Analyses , 2014, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[34]  D. Monzani,et al.  Personality and Optimal Experience in Adolescence: Implications for Well-Being and Development , 2014 .

[35]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Making flow happen: the effects of being recovered on work-related flow between and within days. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Norito Kawakami,et al.  Work engagement versus workaholism : a test of the spillover-crossover model , 2013 .

[37]  Jeanne Nakamura,et al.  Does flow experience lead to risk? How and for whom. , 2013, Applied psychology. Health and well-being.

[38]  R. Maeran,et al.  Flow experience and job characteristics: Analyzing the role of flow in job satisfaction , 2013 .

[39]  Yanhan Zhu,et al.  A Review of Job Satisfaction , 2012 .

[40]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Everyday working life: Explaining within-person fluctuations in employee well-being , 2012 .

[41]  J. Navarro,et al.  ‘Suddenly I get into the zone’: Examining discontinuities and nonlinear changes in flow experiences at work , 2012 .

[42]  Clive J. Fullagar,et al.  Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery , 2012 .

[43]  Kyota Okishima,et al.  Flow experience and health-related quality of life in community dwelling elderly Japanese. , 2012, Nursing & health sciences.

[44]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job resources and flow at work: Modelling the relationship via latent growth curve and mixture model methodology , 2010 .

[45]  K. Asakawa,et al.  Flow Experience, Culture, and Well-being: How Do Autotelic Japanese College Students Feel, Behave, and Think in Their Daily Lives? , 2010 .

[46]  Bryan Cleal,et al.  Predicting flow at work: investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work. , 2010, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[47]  Therese D. Pigott,et al.  How Many Studies Do You Need? , 2010 .

[48]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Flow at work: An experience sampling approach , 2009 .

[49]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. , 2009 .

[50]  Thais Piassa Rogatko.  The Influence of Flow on Positive Affect in College Students , 2009 .

[51]  S. Engeser,et al.  Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance , 2008 .

[52]  A. Bakker.  The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF , 2008 .

[53]  B. Fritz,et al.  The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students , 2007 .

[54]  Leif R. Hedman,et al.  Using information technology: engagement modes, flow experience, and personality orientations , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[56]  E. Demerouti.  Job characteristics, flow, and performance: the moderating role of conscientiousness. , 2006, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[57]  A. Bakker,et al.  Flow at Work: Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources* , 2006 .

[58]  Nathan P. Podsakoff,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance , 2005 .

[59]  K. Asakawa.  Flow Experience and Autotelic Personality in Japanese College Students: How do they Experience Challenges in Daily Life? , 2004 .

[60]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  History and Use of Relative Importance Indices in Organizational Research , 2004 .

[62]  G. Moneta.  The Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation in Chinese: Cultural and Personal Moderators , 2004 .

[63]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[64]  R. Eklund,et al.  Assessing Flow in Physical Activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2 , 2002 .

[65]  Jo Bryce,et al.  Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers , 2002 .

[66]  B. Fredrickson.  The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[67]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Happiness, flow, and economic equality. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[68]  B. Bass.  Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership , 1999 .

[69]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Value as a Moderator in Subjective Well‐Being , 1999 .

[70]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes , 1997 .

[71]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[72]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[74]  C. Rogers.  Toward a Science of the Person , 1963 .

[75]  Dimitri van der Linden,et al.  Measures of flow proneness mainly assess the general factor of personality , 2022, Personality and Individual Differences.

[76]  C. Peifer,et al.  Flow in the Context of Work , 2021 .

[77]  Kelly Schwind Wilson,et al.  Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well‐Being , 2017 .

[78]  Darija Aleksić.  The negative aspects of flow : examining relationships between flow and unethical behavior , 2016 .

[79]  Van Ittersum,et al.  The distinctiveness of engagement and flow at work , 2015 .

[80]  Aisha Zubair,et al.  Authentic Leadership and Creativity: Mediating Role of Work-Related Flow and Psychological Capital , 2015 .

[81]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Concept of Flow , 2014 .

[82]  I. Ntroducing.  FLOW EXPERIENCE AND JOB CHARACTERISTICS : ANALYZING THE ROLE OF FLOW IN JOB SATISFACTION , 2013 .

[83]  Johannes Keller,et al.  Flow and Its Affective, Cognitive, and Performance-Related Consequences , 2012 .

[84]  Guy Madison,et al.  Proneness for psychological flow in everyday life : associations with personality and intelligence , 2012 .

[85]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  The dynamics of proactivity at work , 2008 .

[86]  B. Avolio,et al.  . , 2005, The Leadership Quarterly.

[87]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[88]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Flow and Creativity. , 1997 .

[89]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[90]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[91]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[92]  Abraham H. Maslow,et al.  SELF-ACTUALIZATION AND BEYOND. , 1965 .