Different regulation of T-box genes Tbx4 and Tbx5 during limb development and limb regeneration.

The T-domain transcription factors Tbx4 and Tbx5 have been implicated, by virtue of their limb-type specific expression, in controlling the identity of vertebrate legs and arms, respectively. To study the roles of these genes in developing and regenerating limbs, we cloned Tbx4 and Tbx5 cDNAs from the newt, and generated antisera that recognize Tbx4 or Tbx5 proteins. We show here that, in two urodele amphibians, newts and axolotls, the regulation of Tbx4 and Tbx5 differs from higher vertebrates. At the mRNA and protein level, both Tbx4 and Tbx5 are expressed in developing hindlimbs as well as in developing forelimbs. The coexpression of these genes argues that additional factors are involved in the control of limb type-specific patterns. In addition, newt and axolotl Tbx4 and Tbx5 expression is regulated differently during embryogenesis and regenerative morphogenesis. During regeneration, Tbx5 is exclusively upregulated in the forelimbs, whereas Tbx4 is exclusively upregulated in the hindlimbs. This indicates that, on a molecular level, different regulatory mechanisms control the shaping of identical limb structures and that regeneration is not simply a reiteration of developmental gene programs.

[1]  T. Ogura,et al.  Correlation of wing-leg identity in ectopic FGF-induced chimeric limbs with the differential expression of chick Tbx5 and Tbx4. , 1998, Development.

[2]  Ryozo Nagai,et al.  Tbx5 associates with Nkx2-5 and synergistically promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[3]  D. Stocum.  Regenerative biology: a millenial revolution. , 1999, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[4]  S. Bryant,et al.  Regulation of HoxA expression in developing and regenerating axolotl limbs. , 1995, Development.

[5]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Differential regulation of Hox C6 in the appendages of adult urodeles and anurans. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Helen Pearson,et al.  The regeneration gap , 2001, Nature.

[7]  J. Cooke,et al.  FGF and genes encoding transcription factors in early limb specification , 2000, Mechanisms of Development.

[8]  R. Kucherlapati,et al.  Mutations in human cause limb and cardiac malformation in Holt-Oram syndrome , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[9]  H. Simon.  T-box genes and the formation of vertebrate forelimb- and hindlimb specific pattern , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[10]  C. Tabin,et al.  Differential regulation of T-box and homeobox transcription factors suggests roles in controlling chick limb-type identity. , 1998, Development.

[11]  J. Schmitt,et al.  A Murine Model of Holt-Oram Syndrome Defines Roles of the T-Box Transcription Factor Tbx5 in Cardiogenesis and Disease , 2001, Cell.

[12]  C. Tabin,et al.  Differential expression of myogenic regulatory genes and Msx‐1 during dedifferentiation and redifferentiation of regenerating amphibian limbs , 1995, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[13]  D. Saito,et al.  Specification and determination of limb identity: evidence for inhibitory regulation of Tbx gene expression. , 2002, Development.

[14]  L. Silver,et al.  Evolution of mouse T-box genes by tandem duplication and cluster dispersion. , 1996, Genetics.

[15]  D. Stocum,et al.  Epidermal‐mesodermal interaction during morphogenesis of the limb regeneration blastema in larval salamanders , 1972 .

[16]  Concepción Rodríguez-Esteban,et al.  The T-box genes Tbx4 and Tbx5 regulate limb outgrowth and identity , 1999, Nature.

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  A novel family of T-box genes in urodele amphibian limb development and regeneration: candidate genes involved in vertebrate forelimb/hindlimb patterning. , 1997, Development.

[18]  Susan V. Bryant,et al.  Forelimb regeneration from different levels of amputation in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens: Length, rate, and stages , 1973, Wilhelm Roux' Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen.

[19]  C. Müller,et al.  Crystallographic structure of the T domain–DNA complex of the Brachyury transcription factor , 1997, Nature.

[20]  C. Tabin,et al.  Molecular Models for Vertebrate Limb Development , 1997, Cell.

[21]  Tohru Itoh,et al.  WNT Signals Control FGF-Dependent Limb Initiation and AER Induction in the Chick Embryo , 2001, Cell.

[22]  T. Mikawa,et al.  TBX5 transcription factor regulates cell proliferation during cardiogenesis. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[23]  C. Tabin,et al.  Analysis of Hox-4.5 and Hox-3.6 expression during newt limb regeneration: differential regulation of paralogous Hox genes suggest different roles for members of different Hox clusters. , 1993, Development.

[24]  L. Silver,et al.  Involvement of T-box genes Tbx2-Tbx5 in vertebrate limb specification and development. , 1998, Development.

[25]  S. Bryant,et al.  Expression of Hoxb13 and Hoxc10 in developing and regenerating Axolotl limbs and tails. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[26]  David I. Wilson,et al.  Holt-Oram syndrome is caused by mutations in TBX5, a member of the Brachyury (T) gene family , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[27]  P. B. Gates,et al.  Position dependent expression of a homeobox gene transcript in relation to amphibian limb regeneration. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[28]  P. Khan,et al.  Development of Notophthalmus viridescens embryos , 1995, Development, growth & differentiation.

[29]  J. Brockes,et al.  Amphibian Limb Regeneration: Rebuilding a Complex Structure , 1997, Science.

[30]  K. Patel,et al.  Tbx genes and limb identity in chick embryo development. , 1998, Development.

[31]  Salome Glücksohn.  Äussere Entwicklung der Extremitäten und Stadieneinteilung der Larvenperiode von Triton taeniatus Leyd. und Triton cristatus Laur , 1931, Wilhelm Roux' Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen.

[32]  J. Smith,et al.  Mesoderm formation in response to Brachyury requires FGF signalling , 1995, Current Biology.

[33]  C. Lanctôt,et al.  Hindlimb patterning and mandible development require the Ptx1 gene. , 1999, Development.

[34]  C. Tabin,et al.  Role of Pitx1 upstream of Tbx4 in specification of hindlimb identity. , 1999, Science.

[35]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[36]  V. Papaioannou,et al.  Evidence of a role for T-☐ genes in the evolution of limb morphogenesis and the specification of forelimb/hindlimb identity , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[37]  P. Ingham,et al.  Developmental regulation of Tbx5 in zebrafish embryogenesis , 2000, Mechanisms of Development.

[38]  K. Yasuda,et al.  Tbx5 and Tbx4 genes determine the wing/leg identity of limb buds , 1999, Nature.

[39]  Concepción Rodríguez-Esteban,et al.  Role of the Bicoid-related homeodomain factor Pitx1 in specifying hindlimb morphogenesis and pituitary development. , 1999, Genes & development.

[40]  L. Silver,et al.  The T‐box gene family , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[41]  J. Brockes,et al.  A newt type II keratin restricted to normal and regenerating limbs and tails is responsive to retinoic acid. , 1991, Development.