A water sustainability index for West Java - Part 2: refining the conceptual framework using Delphi technique.

In the first paper of this two-part series on the development of a water sustainability index for West Java, a conceptual framework of West Java Water Sustainability Index (WJWSI) was developed. It consists of three main parts: components, indicators/sub-indicators and threshold values. This second paper of the series presents the application of the Delphi technique, followed by in-depth interviews with selected key experts, to refine the conceptual WJWSI framework. The Delphi application includes the design of the questionnaires, the selection of respondents, the distribution and collection of the completed questionnaires and the analysis of data. After Round One of the Delphi application, the respondents reached consensus for all proposed components in the conceptual framework. However, some modifications to the components were also suggested by few respondents. Regarding the indicators/sub-indicators, consensus for 9 of the proposed 12 indicators was reached, and 5 new indicators were suggested. For the threshold values, consensus was reached for threshold values of 5 indicators. In Round Two of the Delphi application, respondents were asked questions related to results from Round One, which include the modification on the components, indicators/sub-indicators which have not been agreed, and newly suggested indicators/sub-indicators and threshold values. Results of Round Two show that modifications on the components were agreed, and consensus was reached for 8 out of the proposed 9 indicators/sub-indicators. In terms of its components and indicators, the framework was then finalised in the in-depth interview with four key experts, selected from different respondent categories. For the threshold values not yet finalised, further study will be carried out, as there was not much input from the respondents in the Delphi application and the in-depth interview.

[1]  George F. McMahon Sustainability Criteria for Water Resource Systems , 1999 .

[2]  D. Loucks,et al.  Sustainability Criteria for Water Resource Systems , 1998 .

[3]  J. I. Toward,et al.  Brief Report: Exploring Mental Health Service Needs for the Elderly: Results of a Modified Delphi Study , 2002, Community Mental Health Journal.

[4]  Mohammad Asghar Javed Developing a strategic plan for the Pakistan Sports Board using the Delphi technique , 1995 .

[5]  S. H. Dinius Design of an index of water quality , 1987 .

[6]  Norman P. Uhl,et al.  Using the delphi technique in institutional planning , 1983 .

[7]  Jacob Jacoby,et al.  Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. , 1972 .

[8]  Dale A. Lunsford,et al.  Marketing business services in Central Europe: the challenge: a report of expert opinion , 1993 .

[9]  M. Bardecki,et al.  Participants' response to the Delphi method: An attitudinal perspective , 1984 .

[10]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[11]  Franz Lehner,et al.  The future of mobile technology: findings from a European Delphi study , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[12]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Water Resources Sustainability , 2006 .

[13]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Group Confidence Pressures in Iterative Decisions , 1982 .

[14]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Marvin A. Jolson,et al.  http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless , 2022 .

[16]  Roger J. Best,et al.  An experiment in Delphi estimation in marketing decision making. , 1974 .

[17]  R. P. Hudak,et al.  Health care administration in the year 2000: practitioners' views of future issues and job requirements. , 1993, Hospital & health services administration.

[18]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s , 1991, MIS Q..

[19]  H. Chaves,et al.  An Integrated Indicator Based on Basin Hydrology, Environment, Life, and Policy: The Watershed Sustainability Index , 2007 .

[20]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[21]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  DELPHI STUDY ON BRIDGE CONDITION RATING AND EFFECTS OF IMPROVEMENTS , 1991 .

[22]  Kathy K. Franklin,et al.  Idea Generation and Exploration: Benefits and Limitations of the Policy Delphi Research Method , 2006 .

[23]  C. Cude OREGON WATER QUALITY INDEX A TOOL FOR EVALUATING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS 1 , 2001 .

[24]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Agreement on disease-specific criteria for do-not-resuscitate orders in acute stroke. Members of the Canadian and Western New York Stroke Consortiums. , 1996, Stroke.

[25]  Caroline A Sullivan,et al.  Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales , 2006 .

[26]  Wei-Lun Chang,et al.  A Heuristic Model of Network-Based Group Decision Making for E-Services , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[27]  Dorothy Olshfski,et al.  Assessing Training Needs of Executives Using the Delphi Technique , 1991 .

[28]  Trudi Lang,et al.  An Overview of Four Futures Methodologies , 2000 .