A novel algorithm to detect the baseline value of a time signal in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Computed Tomography

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Computed Tomography (DCE-CT) is a functional imaging technique that has aroused a great interest in several clinical applications. The unenhanced portion of DCE-CT signal, the baseline, plays a fundamental role for signal analysis as well as to achieve accurate clinical parameter values, such as perfusion ones, used for diagnosis and prognosis purposes. In this study, a new adaptive iterative algorithm to compute voxel-based baseline values exploiting the maximum number of samples, adaptively for each voxel, is proposed and compared against the three main approaches used in the literature, over a dataset of 30 DCE-CT perfusion (briefly, CTp) liver examinations. Results were evaluated according to classical statistical indexes and tests. The experiments show that voxel-based results achieved by applying the four approaches significantly differ and the error indexes related to our method are the lowest ones. Our results would expectedly improve the accuracy of all methods, including CTp, relying on the whole signal for computation of clinical parameters.

[1]  Agostino Gibaldi,et al.  Effects of guided random sampling of TCCs on blood flow values in CT perfusion studies of lung tumors. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[2]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Quantitative assessment of effects of motion compensation for liver and lung tumors in CT perfusion. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[3]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography , 2012, European Radiology.

[4]  K. Nikolaou,et al.  Iodine concentration as a perfusion surrogate marker in oncology: Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms using Volume Perfusion CT with 80 kVp , 2016, European Radiology.

[5]  Laura B. Morrison,et al.  Improving quantitative CT perfusion parameter measurements using principal component analysis. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[6]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Mathematical Models of Contrast Transport Kinetics for Cancer Diagnostic Imaging: A Review , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Boone,et al.  CT Hounsfield numbers of soft tissues on unenhanced abdominal CT scans: variability between two different manufacturers' MDCT scanners. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Automatic detection of misleading blood flow values in CT perfusion studies of lung cancer , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[9]  Michael Ingrisch,et al.  Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer , 2013, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[10]  Comparison of liver perfusion parameters studied with conventional extravascular and experimental intravascular CT contrast agents. , 2007, Academic radiology.