Life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil: hotspots and cleaner production alternatives

Abstract This paper describes a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of offset paper production in Brazil. The production system is classified into two subsystems: a forest production subsystem, which involves seedling production, soil preparation, seedling planting, forest maintenance, and wood harvesting and transport processes; and an industrial production subsystem, involving wood pulp extraction and bleaching, chemical recovery, and offset paper manufacturing processes. The environmental analysis includes the primary energy demand, environmental impact assessment, and land use indicators. The primary energy demand indicated that the largest amount of both renewable and non-renewable primary energy is consumed by the industrial production subsystem, accounting for 91.0% of the total energy demand. The potential environmental impact assessment included eight impact categories: acidification, ecotoxicity, global warming, human toxicity – cancer effects, human toxicity – non-cancer effects, nutrient enrichment, ozone depletion, and photochemical oxidation. Most of the potential impacts are attributed to the processes of pulp extraction and bleaching, and offset paper manufacturing, mainly due to the production of electricity and thermal energy. As for impacts on land use during the forest activities, a recent developed approach was applied for the regionalized assessment of impacts. Land occupation impacts on erosion resistance, physicochemical filtration, and mechanical filtration showed a reduction in the soil ecological functions, whereas groundwater recharge indicated a credit for the performance of the soil function. With a view to reducing the main life cycle impacts of the industrial production subsystem, an evaluation is made of alternative production scenarios. The best scenario was the substitution of biomass and diesel in the energy generation unit by biomass gasification and optimization of the recovery boiler.

[1]  D. Murdiyarso,et al.  The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in the tropics: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2007 .

[2]  Francisco Antonio Rocco Lahr,et al.  Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard (MDP) produced in Brazil , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[4]  Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva,et al.  Comparison of disposable and returnable packaging: a case study of reverse logistics in Brazil , 2013 .

[5]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[6]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[7]  Petr Stehlík,et al.  Processing of waste from pulp and paper plant , 2005 .

[8]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production. , 1995 .

[9]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[10]  Claudio A. Zaror,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory of Pine and Eucalyptus Cellulose Production in Chile: Effect of Process Modifications , 2011 .

[11]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of total chlorine free pulp from Eucalyptus globulus in Spain , 2009 .

[12]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal , 2007 .

[13]  Tiago Domingos,et al.  Industrial hemp or eucalyptus paper? , 2010 .

[14]  T. Koellner,et al.  Land use impacts on freshwater regulation, erosion regulation, and water purification: a spatial approach for a global scale level , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Shabbir H Gheewala,et al.  LCA: a decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Bruce Sithole,et al.  Pulp and Paper , 2005 .

[17]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater--a review. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry , 2003 .

[19]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Comparison of methodologies for estimating the carbon footprint – case study of office paper , 2012 .

[20]  C. Bauer,et al.  Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) , 2007 .

[21]  Warit Jawjit,et al.  Options to reduce the environmental impact by eucalyptus-based Kraft pulp industry in Thailand: model description , 2007 .

[22]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Guilherme de Paula Galdiano.  Inventário do ciclo de vida do papel offset produzido no Brasil. , 2006 .

[25]  T. Koellner,et al.  UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Christopher J. Biermann,et al.  Essentials of Pulping and Papermaking , 1993 .

[27]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including Life Cycle Assessment for decision-making in controlling wastewater nutrient removal systems. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[29]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Quality tools applied to Cleaner Production programs: a first approach toward a new methodology , 2013 .

[30]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration , 2014 .