mHealth for Maternal Mental Health: Everyday Wisdom in Ethical Design

Health and wellbeing applications increasingly raise ethical issues for design. User-centred and participatory design approaches, while grounded in everyday wisdom, cannot be expected to address ethical reflection consistently, as multiple value systems come into play. We explore the potential of phronesis, a concept from Aristotelian virtue ethics, for mHealth design. Phronesis describes wisdom and judgment garnered from practical experience of specific situations in context. Applied phronesis contributes everyday wisdom to challenging issues for vulnerable target users. Drawing on research into mHealth technologies for psychological wellbeing, we explore how phronesis can inform ethical design. Using a case study on an app for self-reporting symptoms of depression during pregnancy, we present a framework for incorporating a phronetic approach into design, involving: (a) a wide feedback net to capture phronetic input early in design; (b) observing the order of feedback, which directly affects value priorities in design; (c) ethical pluralism recognising different coexisting value systems; (d) acknowledging subjectivity in the disclosure and recognition of individual researcher and participant values. We offer insights into how a phronetic approach can contribute everyday wisdom to designing mHealth technologies to help designers foster the values that promote human flourishing.

[1]  N. Jeffcoate,et al.  The Unborn Child* , 1971, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[2]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[3]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1984 .

[4]  J. Cox,et al.  Detection of Postnatal Depression , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[5]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[6]  M. Sandelowski SEPARATE, BUT LESS UNEQUAL: , 1994 .

[7]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[8]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  User autonomy: who should control what and when? , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[9]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[10]  Philip Brey,et al.  Disclosive computer ethics , 2000, CSOC.

[11]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[12]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design: the third space in HCI , 2002 .

[14]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[15]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Living, and thinking about it: two perspectives on life , 2005 .

[16]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[17]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design , 2005, CHI.

[18]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[19]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[20]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Cees J. Hamelink,et al.  Rethinking ICTs , 2006 .

[22]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  P. Verbeek Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis , 2008 .

[24]  Ann Light,et al.  Designing for social justice: people, technology, learning , 2008 .

[25]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[26]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children , 2009, CHI.

[27]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[29]  David Coyle,et al.  Design and evaluation guidelines for mental health technologies , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[30]  Saturnino Luz,et al.  Fieldwork for requirements: Frameworks for mobile healthcare applications , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Shannon Vallor,et al.  Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship & new social media , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[32]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games , 2011, DiGRA Conference.

[33]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Values in design , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[34]  Mark Matthews,et al.  In the mood: engaging teenagers in psychotherapy using mobile phones , 2011, CHI.

[35]  Aristotle,et al.  Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics , 2011 .

[36]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction , 2011, CHI.

[37]  Sanford F. Schram,et al.  Real social science: Applied phronesis , 2012 .

[38]  Virginia E. Eubanks Real Social Science: Feminist phronesis and technologies of citizenship , 2012 .

[39]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Introduction: New Directions in Social Science , 2012 .

[40]  T. Landman Real Social Science: Phronesis and narrative analysis , 2012 .

[41]  David Coyle,et al.  Engagement with online mental health interventions: an exploratory clinical study of a treatment for depression , 2012, CHI.

[42]  Jean Y. Ko,et al.  Depression and treatment among U.S. pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age, 2005-2009. , 2012, Journal of women's health.

[43]  R. Andorno Do Our Moral Judgments Need to Be Guided by Principles? , 2012, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[44]  Sanford F. Schram,et al.  Real Social Science: Phronetic social science: an idea whose time has come , 2012 .

[45]  Luke Stark,et al.  Methods to account for values in human-centered computing , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[46]  E. Hackett Science, Technology, & Human Values at 40 , 2012 .

[47]  David Coyle,et al.  Designing wellbeing , 2012, DIS '12.

[48]  Chris Brown,et al.  The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? , 2012 .

[49]  David M. McCourt What’s at Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice and Phronēsis in International Relations , 2012 .

[50]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[51]  Jes A. Koepfler,et al.  Charting Sociotechnical Dimensions of Values for Design Research , 2013, Inf. Soc..

[52]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[53]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Values Levers , 2013 .

[54]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts , 2013, CHI.

[55]  Predrag V. Klasnja,et al.  Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research , 2013, CHI.

[56]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media , 2013, CHI.

[57]  A. Bauer,et al.  Costs of perinatal mental health problems , 2014 .

[58]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  @BabySteps: design and evaluation of a system for using twitter for tracking children's developmental milestones , 2014, CHI.

[59]  Madhu Reddy,et al.  "Every pregnancy is different": designing mHealth for the pregnancy ecology , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[60]  L. Floridi The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era , 2014 .

[61]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Values & design in HCI education , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[62]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  Conceptual models: core to good design , 2011, Conceptual Models.

[63]  R. Calvo,et al.  Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential , 2014, Psychology Teaching Review.

[64]  Takahiro Tanaka,et al.  CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2014 .

[65]  Jordan Beck,et al.  Slow change interaction design , 2014, INTR.

[66]  Irene Kamp,et al.  Measuring product happiness , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[67]  Tamara Peyton,et al.  “Every pregnancy is different”: Designing mHealth interventions for the pregnancy ecology , 2014 .

[68]  Suleman Shahid,et al.  Babywijzer: an application to support women during their pregnancy , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[69]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Generating implications for design through design research , 2014, CHI.

[70]  Steven Simske,et al.  Beyond quantified self: data for wellbeing , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[71]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Humanistic HCI , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[72]  Greg Morgan,et al.  The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era , 2015 .

[73]  Shannon Vallor Moral Deskilling and Upskilling in a New Machine Age: Reflections on the Ambiguous Future of Character , 2014, Philosophy & Technology.

[74]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Ethical IT Innovation - A Value-Based System Design Approach , 2015 .

[75]  Nicola Dell,et al.  Engaging Pregnant Women in Kenya with a Hybrid Computer-Human SMS Communication System , 2015, CHI.

[76]  N. Aydın,et al.  Untreated depression in the first trimester of pregnancy leads to postpartum depression: high rates from a natural follow-up study , 2015, Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment.

[77]  Alexis Hope,et al.  A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke" , 2016, CHI.

[78]  M. V. D. Velden,et al.  MoodLine and MoodMap: Designing a Mood Function for a Mobile Application with and for Young Patients , 2016, eTELEMED 2016.

[79]  Stefan Priebe,et al.  Systematic review of patients' participation in and experiences of technology-based monitoring of mental health symptoms in the community , 2016, BMJ Open.

[80]  Tanzeem Choudhury,et al.  Automatic detection of social rhythms in bipolar disorder , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[81]  Christopher A. Paul Values at play in digital games , 2016, New Media Soc..

[82]  Gavin J. Doherty,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about interactivity: Empowerment in public discourse , 2017, New Media Soc..

[83]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Blended, Not Bossy: Ethics Roles, Responsibilities and Expertise in Design , 2017, Interact. Comput..