Comparative statistical analysis between two methods for the measurement of visceral fat in humans

As obesity and its associated diseases becomes one of the major health issues in countries such as Mexico and the US, it becomes increasingly important to understand and apply appropriate methods for the measurement of adiposity, particularly, visceral fat. At present, other techniques such as multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are used to estimate visceral fat in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to compare this technique with the gold standard that is measurement of visceral fat by imaging techniques. In this instance we carried out a study comparing BIA with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In order to do this expeditiously for several studies, we developed a semi automatic segmentation method based on the mean shift filtering technique. A Bland-Altman study was carried out to ascertain if this technique was comparable to the gold standard. Results show that both techniques are not comparable and that BIA technique is very susceptible to the influence of subcutaneous fat, and that indeed it is only linear for a narrow range of subjects.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[4]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[5]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction: definition, efficient algorithm and applications in image analysis , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  Paul F. Whelan,et al.  Measurement and Localisation of Body Fat in Whole Body MRI , 2004 .

[8]  R. Semelka,et al.  Accurate quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) using water‐saturation MRI and computer segmentation: Preliminary results , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Verónica Médina-Bañuelos,et al.  Data-driven brain MRI segmentation supported on edge confidence and a priori tissue information , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  K. Bae,et al.  Total and intraabdominal fat distribution in preadolescents and adolescents: measurement with MR imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Technical evaluation of in vivo abdominal fat and IMCL quantification using MRI and MRSI at 3 T. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  D. Boukerroui,et al.  Phase based level set segmentation of ultrasound images , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[13]  Petter Ranefall,et al.  Automatic segmentation of intra‐abdominal and subcutaneous adipose tissue in 3D whole mouse MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Ahror Belaid,et al.  Phase based level set segmentation of ultrasound images , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[15]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Quantification of abdominal fat accumulation during hyperalimentation using MRI , 2009 .