Identifying consumer requirements as an antidote to resistance to smart meters

Energy efficiency has been the primary motivation for the introduction of smart meters. But current smart metering projects are facing barriers to adoption from consumers, arising from the failure of project sponsors to understand consumers and their requirements. Consumers view smart meters with suspicion, perceiving them to be energy suppliers' efforts to maximise their profits at the expense of consumer costs, choice, health and privacy. For emergent systems like automated metering infrastructure (AMI) to avoid battling to convince consumers of their benefits, it is essential to have user-centric analysis performed before expensive infrastructures are designed and deployed. Various categories of consumers will have their own particular perspectives, and different expectations about how the system should help them to appropriately manage their energy usage. Hence it is essential to segment energy consumers and identify the requirements for each group. In this paper we look at a number of user-centric methods. We then analyse the effectiveness of combining Contextual Design (CD), focus groups and problem extraction to provide insights into energy consumer needs. Based on the analysis we outline a functional specification for a smart meter that would satisfy the energy requirements for a segment of electricity consumer with medical needs.

[1]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[2]  R. Ramakumar,et al.  A Linear Programming Approach to the Design of Integrated Renewable Energy Systems for Developing Countries , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[3]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design: an emergent view of system design , 1990, CHI '90.

[4]  Joseph A. Goguen,et al.  Techniques for requirements elicitation , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[5]  Olly Gotel,et al.  An analysis of the requirements traceability problem , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering.

[6]  Christine Haapala,et al.  User-Centric Software Engineering , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[7]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[8]  Karl E. Wiegers,et al.  Software Requirements , 1999 .

[9]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  User participation in the requirements engineering process: An empirical study , 1996, Requirements Engineering.

[11]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  Modified contextual design as a field evaluation method , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[12]  E. Quinn Privacy and the New Energy Infrastructure , 2009 .

[13]  Phillip Laplante Stakeholder Analysis for Smart Grid Systems , 2010 .

[14]  Sarah C. Darby,et al.  Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? , 2010 .

[15]  H. Farhangi,et al.  The path of the smart grid , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[16]  Xi Fang,et al.  3. Full Four-channel 6.3-gb/s 60-ghz Cmos Transceiver with Low-power Analog and Digital Baseband Circuitry 7. Smart Grid — the New and Improved Power Grid: a Survey , 2022 .

[17]  D. Mah,et al.  Consumer perceptions of smart grid development: Results of a Hong Kong survey and policy implications , 2012 .

[18]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[19]  Neil Brown A Decentralised Approach to Online Trust Validation? , 2013 .

[20]  Anno Accademico,et al.  Smart Grid Communications: Overview of research challenges, solutions and standardization activities , 2013 .

[21]  Roger Clarke,et al.  A Framework for Risk Analysis in Smart Grid - Perspective Based Approach , 2013, CRITIS.

[22]  Ian Brown Britain's smart meter programme: A case study in privacy by design , 2014 .

[23]  Edin Arnautovic,et al.  System Security Requirements Analysis:A Smart Grid Case Study , 2014, Syst. Eng..