The role of topology and thermal backbone fluctuations on sacrificial bond efficacy in mechanical metalloproteins

Sacrificial bonding is a ubiquitous cross-linking strategy for increasing toughness that is found throughout nature in various biological materials such as bone, wood, silk and mussel byssal threads. However, the molecular mechanism of sacrificial bonding remains only poorly understood. Molecular modeling possesses a strong potential to provide insights into the behavior of these cross-links. Here we use Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the effect of reversible sacrificial binding sites on the mechanical properties of single linear polymer chains based on load-bearing metalloproteins found in the mussel byssus. It is shown that the topology of the bonds determines the position and spacing of sacrificial force peaks, while the height of these peaks is intimately tied to the magnitude of thermal fluctuations in the chain that are dependent on effective chain length. These results bear important implications for understanding natural systems and for the generation of strong and ductile biomimetic polymers.

[1]  Devin G. Barrett,et al.  pH‐Based Regulation of Hydrogel Mechanical Properties Through Mussel‐Inspired Chemistry and Processing , 2013, Advanced functional materials.

[2]  Himadri S. Gupta,et al.  Pseudoelastic behaviour of a natural material is achieved via reversible changes in protein backbone conformation , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  D. Heermann,et al.  Loops Determine the Mechanical Properties of Mitotic Chromosomes , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  K. Binder,et al.  Stretching semiflexible polymer chains: evidence for the importance of excluded volume effects from Monte Carlo simulation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  K. Binder,et al.  Breakdown of the Kratky-Porod wormlike chain model for semiflexible polymers in two dimensions , 2011, 1111.3231.

[6]  Bruce P. Lee,et al.  Mussel-Inspired Adhesives and Coatings. , 2011, Annual review of materials research.

[7]  H. Qian Nonlinear stochastic dynamics of mesoscopic homogeneous biochemical reaction systems—an analytical theory , 2011 .

[8]  Henrik Birkedal,et al.  pH-induced metal-ligand cross-links inspired by mussel yield self-healing polymer networks with near-covalent elastic moduli , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Hongbo Zeng,et al.  Protein- and Metal-dependent Interactions of a Prominent Protein in Mussel Adhesive Plaques* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Iron-Clad Fibers: A Metal-Based Biological Strategy for Hard Flexible Coatings , 2010, Science.

[11]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Nanoconfinement Controls Stiffness, Strength and Mechanical Toughness of Β-sheet Crystals in Silk , 2010 .

[12]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Sacrificial Ionic Bonds Need To Be Randomly Distributed To Provide Shear Deformability , 2009, Nano letters.

[13]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Collagen insulated from tensile damage by domains that unfold reversibly: in situ X-ray investigation of mechanical yield and damage repair in the mussel byssus. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[14]  Karen Willcox,et al.  Kinetics and kinematics for translational motions in microgravity during parabolic flight. , 2009, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Single molecule force spectroscopy reveals engineered metal chelation is a general approach to enhance mechanical stability of proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Uz,et al.  Reply to Herz et al. and Humphrey et al.: Genetic heterogeneity of cerebellar hypoplasia with quadrupedal locomotion , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P. Cordier,et al.  Self-healing and thermoreversible rubber from supramolecular assembly , 2008, Nature.

[18]  J. Waite,et al.  Holdfast heroics: comparing the molecular and mechanical properties of Mytilus californianus byssal threads , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Y. Dufrêne,et al.  The NTA–His6 bond is strong enough for AFM single‐molecular recognition studies , 2007, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[20]  Richard Weinkamer,et al.  Nature’s hierarchical materials , 2007 .

[21]  Michael Kerschnitzki,et al.  Evidence for an elementary process in bone plasticity with an activation enthalpy of 1 eV , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  Norbert F Scherer,et al.  Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Dagastine,et al.  Diatom adhesive mucilage contains distinct supramolecular assemblies of a single modular protein. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Georg Schitter,et al.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length: unraveling molecular mesostructures in tough materials. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[25]  R. Dagastine,et al.  Single adhesive nanofibers from a live diatom have the signature fingerprint of modular proteins. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Jacqueline A. Cutroni,et al.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture , 2005, Nature materials.

[27]  Jacqueline A. Cutroni,et al.  Sacrificial bonds in polymer brushes from rat tail tendon functioning as nanoscale velcro. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[28]  S. Craig,et al.  Strong means slow: dynamic contributions to the bulk mechanical properties of supramolecular networks. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  Jozef Keckes,et al.  Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood , 2003, Nature materials.

[30]  H. Hansma,et al.  Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads , 2003, Nature materials.

[31]  L. Willner,et al.  Direct observation of the transition from free to constrained single-segment motion in entangled polymer melts. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[32]  G. Rodin,et al.  Configurational entropy and mechanical properties of cross-linked polymer chains: implications for protein and RNA folding. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Piotr E. Marszalek,et al.  Stretching single molecules into novel conformations using the atomic force microscope , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  Kurt Binder,et al.  A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics , 2000 .

[35]  H. Gaub,et al.  A metal-chelating microscopy tip as a new toolbox for single-molecule experiments by atomic force microscopy. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[36]  C. Riener,et al.  Recognition Force Spectroscopy Studies of the NTA-His6 Bond , 2000 .

[37]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Mechanical unfolding intermediates in titin modules , 1999, Nature.

[38]  Mario Viani,et al.  Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites , 1999, Nature.

[39]  G. Hadziioannou,et al.  Entropic elasticity of single polymer chains of poly(methacrylic acid) measured by atomic force microscopy , 1999 .

[40]  Andres F. Oberhauser,et al.  The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin , 1998, Nature.

[41]  M. Rief,et al.  Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. , 1997, Science.

[42]  P. Gennes,et al.  Reptation of a Polymer Chain in the Presence of Fixed Obstacles , 1971 .

[43]  L. Pettit,et al.  Stereoselectivity in enthalpy changes accompanying the formation of metal complexes of histidine and other amino-acids , 1971 .

[44]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale. , 2008, Nano letters.

[45]  Yang D. Teng,et al.  Segmented nanofibers of spider dragline silk : Atomic force microscopy and single-molecule force spectroscopy , 2002 .