Extensions to the Gaussian Copula: Random Recovery and Random Factor Loadings

This paper presents two new models of portfolio default loss that extend the standard Gaussian copula model yet preserve tractability and computational efficiency. In one extension, we randomize recovery rates, explicitly allowing for the empirically well-established effect of inverse correlation between recovery rates and default frequencies. In another extension, we build into the model random systematic factor loadings, effectively allowing default correlations to be higher in bear markets than in bull markets. In both extensions, special cases of the models are shown to be as tractable as the Gaussian copula model and to allow efficient calibration to market credit spreads. We demonstrate that the models - even in their simplest versions - can generate highly significant pricing effects such as fat tails and a correlation "skew" in synthetic CDO tranche prices. When properly calibrated, the skew effect of random recovery is quite minor, but the extension with random factor loadings can produce correlation skews similar to the steep skews observed in the market. We briefly discuss two alternative skew models, one based on the Marshall-Olkin copula, the other on a spread-dependent correlation specification for the Gaussian copula.

[1]  Alan G. White,et al.  Valuation of a CDO and an n-th to Default CDS Without Monte Carlo Simulation , 2004 .

[2]  K. Jordan,et al.  I Will Survive: Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youths' Experience of High School , 1997 .

[3]  Chunsheng Zhou Default correlation: an analytical result , 1997 .

[4]  Nikunj Kapadia,et al.  Correlated Default Risk , 2006 .

[5]  Darrell Duffie,et al.  Risk and Valuation of Collateralized Debt Obligations , 2001 .

[6]  K. Giesecke A Simple Exponential Model for Dependent Defaults , 2003 .

[7]  Jon Gregory,et al.  In the Core of Correlation , 2004 .

[8]  Viral V. Acharya,et al.  Understanding the Recovery Rates on Defaulted Securities , 2003 .

[9]  Van Vuuren,et al.  "I will survive" , 2017 .

[10]  David X. Li On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach , 1999 .

[11]  Robert Jarrow,et al.  Default Parameter Estimation Using Market Prices , 2001 .

[12]  M. Guzmán Moody ’ s Model for Predicting Loss Given Default ( LGD ) , 2002 .

[13]  P. Collin‐Dufresne,et al.  Do Credit Spreads Reflect Stationary Leverage Ratios , 2001 .

[14]  W. Perraudin,et al.  The Dependence of Recovery Rates and Defaults , 2006 .

[15]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Chapter 8 – Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management , 2003 .

[16]  Philipp J. Schönbucher,et al.  Factor Models: Portfolio Credit Risks When Defaults are Correlated , 2001 .

[17]  Esa Jokivuolle,et al.  A Model for Estimating Recovery Rates and Collateral Haircuts for Bank Loans , 2000 .

[18]  R. C. Merton,et al.  On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates , 1974, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[19]  Douglas J. Lucas Default Correlation and Credit Analysis , 1995 .

[20]  Modelling Dynamic Portfolio Credit Risk , 2003 .

[21]  Alexander J. McNeil,et al.  Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk , 2003 .

[22]  H. Leland.,et al.  Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads , 1996, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[23]  R. Jarrow,et al.  Counterparty Risk and the Pricing of Defaultable Securities , 1999 .

[24]  Andrea Resti,et al.  The Link between Default and Recovery Rates: Theory, Empirical Evidence and Implications , 2003 .

[25]  K. Singleton,et al.  Simulating Correlated Defaults , 1999 .

[26]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Correlation: Pitfalls and Alternatives , 1999 .

[27]  A. McNeil,et al.  KENDALL'S TAU FOR ELLIPTICAL DISTRIBUTIONS ∗ , 2003 .