Probabilistic mapping of human functional brain networks identifies regions of high group consensus

Many recent developments surrounding the functional network organization of the human brain have focused on data that have been averaged across groups of individuals. While such group-level approaches have shed considerable light on the brain’s large-scale distributed systems, they conceal individual differences in network organization, which recent work has demonstrated to be common and widespread. This individual variability produces noise in group analyses, which may average together regions that are part of different functional systems across participants, limiting interpretability. However, cost and feasibility constraints may limit the possibility for individual-level mapping within studies. Here our goal was to leverage information about individual-level brain organization to probabilistically map common functional systems and identify locations of high inter-subject consensus for use in group analyses. We probabilistically mapped 14 functional networks in multiple datasets with relatively high amounts of data. All networks show “core” (high-probability) regions, but differ from one another in the extent of their higher-variability components. These patterns replicate well across four datasets with different participants and scanning parameters. We produced a set of high-probability regions of interest (ROIs) from these probabilistic maps; these and the probabilistic maps are made publicly available, together with a tool for querying the network membership probabilities associated with any given cortical location. These quantitative estimates and public tools may allow researchers to apply information about inter-subject consensus to their own fMRI studies, improving inferences about systems and their functional specializations.

[1]  Max C. Keuken,et al.  A probabilistic atlas of the basal ganglia using 7 T MRI , 2015, Data in brief.

[2]  Elisabeth J. Ploran,et al.  Distinct Stages of Moment‐to‐Moment Processing in the Cinguloopercular and Frontoparietal Networks , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[4]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Deanna J. Greene,et al.  A set of functionally-defined brain regions with improved representation of the subcortex and cerebellum , 2020, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Rodrigo M. Braga,et al.  Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity , 2017, Neuron.

[9]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[10]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Mitigating head motion artifact in functional connectivity MRI , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[11]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[12]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks , 2018, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Wolfgang M. Pauli,et al.  A High-Resolution Probabilistic In Vivo Atlas of Human Subcortical Brain Nuclei , 2017 .

[16]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[17]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Evidence for Hubs in Human Functional Brain Networks , 2013, Neuron.

[18]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Control-related systems in the human brain , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[21]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[23]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Three Distinct Sets of Connector Hubs Integrate Human Brain Function. , 2018, Cell reports.

[26]  Julia M. Huntenburg,et al.  Large-Scale Gradients in Human Cortical Organization , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Imaging-based parcellations of the human brain , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  A modality‐independent approach to spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain , 1995 .

[29]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Individual-specific features of brain systems identified with resting state functional correlations , 2017, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[32]  Timothy S. Coalson,et al.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A probabilistic MR atlas of the human cerebellum , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Joseph W. Dubis,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Error-Related Activity in the Human Brain , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity: Characteristics and mitigation strategies , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[38]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Towards a Universal Taxonomy of Macro-scale Functional Human Brain Networks , 2019, Brain Topography.

[39]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Wolfgang M Pauli,et al.  Descriptor : A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei , 2018 .

[41]  Steven E. Petersen,et al.  A set of functionally-defined brain regions with improved representation of the subcortex and cerebellum , 2018, NeuroImage.

[42]  Liang Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Maps of Visual Topography in Human Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates , 2018, NeuroImage.

[44]  Steven E Petersen,et al.  Tasks Driven by Perceptual Information Do Not Recruit Sustained BOLD Activity in Cingulo-Opercular Regions. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Focal Brain Lesions to Critical Locations Cause Widespread Disruption of the Modular Organization of the Brain , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Ridding fMRI data of motion-related influences: Removal of signals with distinct spatial and physical bases in multiecho data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Spatial Topography of Individual-Specific Cortical Networks Predicts Human Cognition, Personality, and Emotion. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Trait-like variants in human functional brain networks , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[50]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[51]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Network measures predict neuropsychological outcome after brain injury , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Reproducibility of Single-Subject Functional Connectivity Measurements , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[53]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Individual Variability of the System‐Level Organization of the Human Brain , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Fluctuations in Global Brain Activity Are Associated With Changes in Whole-Brain Connectivity of Functional Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[56]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.