A dissociation between consolidated perceptual learning and sensory adaptation in vision

Perceptual learning refers to improvement in perception thresholds with practice, however, extended training sessions show reduced performance during training, interfering with learning. These effects were taken to indicate a tight link between sensory adaptation and learning. Here we show a dissociation between adaptation and consolidated learning. Participants trained with a texture discrimination task, in which visual processing time is limited by a temporal target-to-mask window defined as the Stimulus-Onset-Asynchrony (SOA). An initial training phase, previously shown to produce efficient learning, was followed by training structures with varying numbers of SOAs. Largest interference with learning was found in structures containing the largest SOA density, when SOA was gradually decreased. When SOAs were largely kept unchanged, learning was effective. All training structures yielded the same within-session performance reduction, as expected from sensory adaptation. The results point to a dissociation between within-day effects, which depend on the number of trials per se regardless of their temporal structure, and consolidation effects observed on the following day, which were mediated by the temporal structure of practice. These results add a new dimension to consolidation in perceptual learning, suggesting that the degree of its effectiveness depends on variations in temporal properties of the visual stimuli.

[1]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Global resistance to local perceptual adaptation in texture discrimination , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[3]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Glickman,et al.  Perseverative neural processes and consolidation of the memory trace. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  M. Thirkettle,et al.  Contributions of form, motion and task to biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Dov Sagi,et al.  A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of trial repetition in texture discrimination , 2007, Vision Research.

[9]  J. D. McGaugh Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[10]  G. Boynton,et al.  The time course and specificity of perceptual deterioration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Fan Wu,et al.  Robust object-based encoding in visual working memory. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[12]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[13]  D. Sagi,et al.  Generalized Perceptual Learning in the Absence of Sensory Adaptation , 2012, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Sagi,et al.  Benefits of efficient consolidation: Short training enables long-term resistance to perceptual adaptation induced by intensive testing , 2008, Vision Research.

[15]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatiotemporal consistencies on visual learning dynamics and transfer , 2015, Vision Research.

[16]  Rui Chen,et al.  Hes1 promotes additional cell cycles when used to replace Math5 , 2013 .

[17]  D. Sagi Perceptual learning in Vision Research , 2011, Vision Research.

[18]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Early-vision brain responses which predict human visual segmentation and learning. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[19]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Target-selective tilt aftereffect during texture learning , 2016, Vision Research.

[20]  Cong Yu,et al.  The classical TDT perceptual learning is mostly temporal learning. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[21]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Two‐stage model in perceptual learning: toward a unified theory , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.