Statistical control of the spectral quality index in electron beams.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In radiotherapy with electron linear accelerators, it is mandatory to guarantee the stability of beam output spectra. In this work we study the quality control of the magnitude that provides the beam spectral quality, by following statistical techniques usual in industry process. METHODS We establish the differences between the measurement of the reference quality index, R(50,ion), which involves usually a costly procedure, and that of the index used for the statistical control, which can be done in an easier way and with a higher frequency. The methodology developed is applied to a Siemens Mevatron KDS electron linear accelerator, specifically for the 6, 12 and 18 MeV modes. The uncertainties of both procedures are evaluated and are correlated. A retrospective analysis of the data registered during more than 13 years is carried out using CUSUM algorithmic and moving range charts. RESULTS The larger uncertainties in R(50,ion) come from the measurement device and the observer. The uncertainty in the measurement of the statistical control variable, which is mainly due to the geometry setup, is negligible against its intrinsic variability. The application of CUSUM charts pointed out different out of control situations linked in much cases to assignable causes. In addition, moving range charts showed up situations of anomalous functioning of the LINAC. CONCLUSIONS Algorithmic CUSUM charts permit a nice monitoring of R(50,ion). If the variability is not controlled, by using charts such as the moving range ones, the number of false alarms could increase without a change in the mean value of R(50,ion).

[1]  J. R. Williams,et al.  Radiotherapy physics : in practice , 2000 .

[2]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Moving from IMRT QA measurements toward independent computer calculations using control charts. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  R. K. Bull,et al.  Radiation dosimetry: Electron beams with energies between 1 and 50 MeV: ICRU Report 35; 157 pp.; 85 figures; US $23.00. , 1986 .

[4]  A L Boyer,et al.  Effects of dosimetric and clinical uncertainty on complication-free local tumor control. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Quality in radiation oncology. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Rogers,et al.  AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  William H. Woodall,et al.  The design of CUSUM quality control charts , 1986 .

[8]  P. Harteloh,et al.  Quality assurance in health care. From a traditional towards a modern approach. , 1994, Health policy.

[9]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance. , 2005, Medical physics.

[10]  G X Ding,et al.  R50 as a beam quality specifier for selecting stopping-power ratios and reference depths for electron dosimetry. , 1996, Medical physics.

[11]  K Holli,et al.  Quality control in health care: an experiment in radiotherapy planning for breast cancer patients after mastectomy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[13]  Michael B Sharpe,et al.  Statistical process control for IMRT dosimetric verification. , 2008, Medical physics.

[14]  K. Holli,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy of breast cancer--variability in planning target volume delineation. , 2001, Acta oncologica.

[15]  A. Shaji,et al.  Measurement system analysis , 2006, Third IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and Applications (DELTA'06).

[16]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Statistical Process Control , 2018 .

[17]  P. Andreo,et al.  Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water , 2001 .