Conditional-moment Closure with Differential Diffusion for Soot Evolution in Fire

The conditional-moment closure (CMC) equation for the evolution of a large Lewis number scalar, soot, is derived starting from the joint probability density function (pdf) equation for the gas-phase mixture fraction, ξ g , and the soot mass fraction, Y s . Unlike previous approaches starting with the joint pdf, the residual terms that result from the typical closure models were retained. A new formulation of the one-dimensional turbulence (ODT) model suitable for spatially evolving flows with buoyant acceleration and radiative transport in participating media was employed to carry out simulations of a prototypical ethene fire. The resulting ODT evolution of ξ g and Y s was used to assess the significance of various terms in the CMC equation including the residual correlations. The terms involving differential diffusion are found to be important along with the soot source terms and the large-scale evolution of both ξ g and Y s . Of particular importance in the regions in mixture-fraction space around the soot production and consumption is a residual term, not previously identified, related to the correlation between the differential diffusion and Y s . This term results in a diffusion-like behavior of Y s in the mixture fraction coordinate that has an apparent Lewis number near unity. In scenarios where the large Lewis number component is a non-negligible component of the mixture fraction (i.e., large soot loading), it is found easier to employ a mixture fraction neglecting this component. Such a mixture-fraction variable has a chemical source term, but this appears easier to model than the differential diffusion and dissipation terms that result when the large Lewis number component is retained in the mixture-fraction definition.

[1]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Multicomponent diffusion of various admixtures in turbulent flow , 1990 .

[2]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-eddy modelling of turbulent transport. Part 6. Microstructure of diffusive scalar mixing fields , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  M. Fairweather,et al.  Predictions of radiative transfer from a turbulent reacting jet in a cross-wind , 1992 .

[4]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent reacting flow , 1993 .

[5]  G. Kosály,et al.  Differentially diffusing scalars in turbulence , 1997 .

[6]  N. Peters,et al.  Unsteady flamelet modeling of turbulent hydrogen-air diffusion flames , 1998 .

[7]  N. Peters,et al.  A Consistent Flamelet Formulation for Non-Premixed Combustion Considering Differential Diffusion Effects , 1998 .

[8]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion , 1999 .

[9]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  One-dimensional turbulence: model formulation and application to homogeneous turbulence, shear flows, and buoyant stratified flows , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Modeling soot formation in turbulent methane–air jet diffusion flames , 2000 .

[11]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Unsteady Flamelet Modeling of Soot Formation in Turbulent Diffusion Flames , 2000 .

[12]  J C Hewson,et al.  Stochastic simulation of transport and chemical kinetics in turbulent CO/H2/N2 flames , 2001 .

[13]  Passive scalar mixing in a spatially developing shear layer: Comparison of one-dimensional turbulence simulations with experimental results , 2003 .