Author ’ s personal copy CHAPTER 7 Implicit Solvent Models in Molecular Dynamics Simulations : A Brief Overview

Abstract Implicit solvent framework is briefly introduced, with the focus on its advantages and limitations for use in molecular simulations. The hierarchy of approximations that leads to some of the practical models based on the framework is discussed. The Generalized Born model is considered in more detail, including its basis, examples of applications, and limitations. Alternative approaches and methodological challenges are also touched upon.

[1]  Andrew T. Fenley,et al.  Analytical electrostatics for biomolecules: beyond the generalized Born approximation. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  B. Dominy,et al.  Development of a generalized Born model parameterization for proteins and nucleic acids , 1999 .

[3]  A. Roitberg,et al.  All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  D. Case,et al.  Modification of the Generalized Born Model Suitable for Macromolecules , 2000 .

[5]  D. Case,et al.  Constant pH molecular dynamics in generalized Born implicit solvent , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  AGBNP: An analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  Velin Z. Spassov,et al.  Introducing an Implicit Membrane in Generalized Born/Solvent Accessibility Continuum Solvent Models , 2002 .

[8]  Asim Okur,et al.  Improved Efficiency of Replica Exchange Simulations through Use of a Hybrid Explicit/Implicit Solvation Model. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  Comment on: Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water? The Poisson-Boltzmann equation by Zhou, R. et al. , 2004 .

[10]  David L Mobley,et al.  Charge asymmetries in hydration of polar solutes. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Peijuan Zhu,et al.  Implementation and testing of stable, fast implicit solvation in molecular dynamics using the smooth‐permittivity finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann method , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  William Swope,et al.  Understanding folding and design: Replica-exchange simulations of ``Trp-cage'' miniproteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Peter Scheffel,et al.  Incorporating variable dielectric environments into the generalized Born model. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  J. Andrew Grant,et al.  A smooth permittivity function for Poisson–Boltzmann solvation methods , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  D. Case,et al.  Generalized Born Models of Macromolecular Solvation Effects , 2001 .

[16]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Tomasz Grycuk,et al.  Deficiency of the Coulomb-field approximation in the generalized Born model: An improved formula for Born radii evaluation , 2003 .

[18]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[19]  C. Brooks,et al.  Interfacial folding and membrane insertion of designed peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Ting Wang,et al.  Implicit solvent models for flexible protein–protein docking by molecular dynamics simulation , 2002, Proteins.

[21]  Soonmin Jang,et al.  Ab initio folding of helix bundle proteins using molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[23]  T. Schlick Molecular modeling and simulation , 2002 .

[24]  P Beroza,et al.  Calculations of proton-binding thermodynamics in proteins. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  C. Brooks,et al.  Novel generalized Born methods , 2002 .

[26]  J. Apostolakis,et al.  Continuum Electrostatic Energies of Macromolecules in Aqueous Solutions , 1997 .

[27]  J. Rottler Local electrostatics algorithm for classical molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Biotechnology,et al.  DAPI binding to the DNA minor groove: a continuum solvent analysis , 2002, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[30]  B. Berne,et al.  Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Electrostatics and dynamics of proteins , 2003 .

[32]  M. Feig,et al.  A generalized Born formalism for heterogeneous dielectric environments: application to the implicit modeling of biological membranes. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  J. Ramstein,et al.  Energetic coupling between DNA bending and base pair opening. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  Accurate representation of B-DNA double helical structure with implicit solvent and counterions. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[36]  H. Nymeyer,et al.  Simulation of the folding equilibrium of α-helical peptides: A comparison of the generalized Born approximation with explicit solvent , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics , 1999 .

[38]  B. Berne,et al.  Comment on “ Can a Continuum Solvent Model Reproduce the Free Energy Landscape of a â-Hairpin Folding in Water ? ” The Poisson-Boltzmann Equation , 2022 .

[39]  D. Case,et al.  Modeling of flap endonuclease interactions with DNA substrate. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Lauren Wickstrom,et al.  Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[41]  J. Chocholousová,et al.  Implicit solvent simulations of DNA and DNA-protein complexes: agreement with explicit solvent vs experiment. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[42]  M K Gilson,et al.  Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[43]  Mark A Olson,et al.  An efficient hybrid explicit/implicit solvent method for biomolecular simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[44]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  Ray Luo,et al.  Comparison of generalized born and poisson models: Energetics and dynamics of HIV protease , 2000 .

[46]  D. Case,et al.  Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations , 2000, Biopolymers.

[47]  Jory Z. Ruscio,et al.  A computational study of nucleosomal DNA flexibility. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[48]  W. Olson,et al.  Bending of DNA by asymmetric charge neutralization: all-atom energy simulations. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Insights into nucleic acid conformational dynamics from massively parallel stochastic simulations. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[50]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Limitations of atom-centered dielectric functions in implicit solvent models. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[51]  D. Nolde,et al.  Peptides and proteins in membranes: what can we learn via computer simulations? , 2004, Current medicinal chemistry.

[52]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Biological Applications of Electrostatic Calculations and Brownian Dynamics Simulations , 2007 .

[53]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Generalized Born model with a simple, robust molecular volume correction. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[54]  D. Case,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids with a Generalized Born Solvation Model , 2000 .

[55]  Ray Luo,et al.  Accelerated Poisson–Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  R. Friesner,et al.  Generalized Born Model Based on a Surface Integral Formulation , 1998 .

[57]  Manoranjan Panda,et al.  Explicit ion, implicit water solvation for molecular dynamics of nucleic acids and highly charged molecules , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  John Mongan,et al.  Analysis of integral expressions for effective Born radii. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[59]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Pairwise solute descreening of solute charges from a dielectric medium , 1995 .

[60]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[61]  Wei Cai,et al.  Extending the fast multipole method to charges inside or outside a dielectric sphere , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[62]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  HIV-1 protease flaps spontaneously open and reclose in molecular dynamics simulations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Graca Raposo,et al.  Correction for Wagoner and Baker, Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: The importance of dispersion and volume terms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  J A McCammon,et al.  Coupling nonpolar and polar solvation free energies in implicit solvent models. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[65]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations , 1995 .

[66]  R Abagyan,et al.  Rapid boundary element solvation electrostatics calculations in folding simulations: successful folding of a 23-residue peptide. , 2001, Biopolymers.

[67]  David A. Case,et al.  Effective Born radii in the generalized Born approximation: The importance of being perfect , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[68]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[69]  T. Simonson,et al.  Protein molecular dynamics with the generalized born/ACE solvent model , 2001, Proteins.

[70]  C. Brooks,et al.  Constant‐pH molecular dynamics using continuous titration coordinates , 2004, Proteins.

[71]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium , 1996 .

[72]  P. Beroza,et al.  Application of a pairwise generalized Born model to proteins and nucleic acids: inclusion of salt effects , 1999 .

[73]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.